@bandarfjb Thanks

@bandarfjb :) I know, but it`s not an option right now. I wish I could buy not one more, maybe 5 more. Maybe, in time :) Till than, i will have to do the best I can with what I have right now.

@bandarfjb Unfortunately, I can not optimize it, since I don`t have an extra 10 TB hdd. It seams like the only thing I can do, is to delete the plot file and replot the whole hdd in smaller plots, than to optimize every plot separately. It will be time consuming, but well, if it helps, I will consider doing it. It took me 3 days to plot the 10 TB so I am looking to another 3 maybe 4 days of work :).

Hello guys. I am mining with an internal 10 TB SATA hdd ( 1 plot, round time 30 sec ) for about a week now and i noticed in the pool that miners with much less plot sizes are mining more efficiently. The miner does not give any errors, everything is working fine on my end and still someone with only 5 TB plot is doing at least 3x as much as I am. How is this possible? I am using jminer. I can not optimize the plot because I don`t have an extra 10 TB hdd. Is there something else I can do to increase my mining efficiency ?
Thx

It`s done. Thank you

I am using jminer. Can you please tell me how can I run two instances?

Hello guys. I managed to plot my 10 TB hdd, after 72 hours, but it is done and it is working already :) I had an issue with the miner from inside the wallet, it was not able to see the plot file, but I started it from command line modifying the path for the plot in the jminer, and it seems to be working fine now. For this hdd I am getting around 30 Sec round time, is this ok? I have another 2 TB external HDD which is plotted for a different wallet. How can I run 2 separate mining operations, for two different drives connected to two different wallets on the same computer? Is this possible?

@haitch Thanks a lot guys for all your help.

Can you please explain me something. On my current plot file the stagger is set 15232 and in Task manager the wplotgenerator uses 7 GB of RAM. If 1 GB of RAM is 4096 than the memory usage should be 15232/4096=3.71 GB of RAM and not 7. What is wrong with this formula?

@haitch Well, I did not knew this, so I changed the GPU plotter to CPU. Everybody learns from own mistakes :) Now, since I started to plot the drive with the CPU plotter and it is working, I think I will leave it to do its job. If something will go wrong, than i will change back to GPU plotter and smaller sizes.