@haitch I'm a strong believer in the saying "Believe none of what you hear, and half of what you see". The perceived loss is a matter of perspective. If my suspicions are correct and has been going on since I started mining then no, it's not penny cents. It's a matter ~5% of my total ROI. But whatever, you can twist it however you want. I said I don't want any arguments but you persist. I must reiterate, I no longer want to discuss this. The state accountability and transparency make it a fools errand. So there you go. End of story. Cheers.

@iKnow0 I appreciate your thoughts and help with my concerns.

@haitch You are jumping to conclusions. I never said that pools should shut down. That's something you have come up with. I did however say that I find it amusing, and still do.

@rds Thanks for the input. The reason I am chasing my suspicions up is that it has been a concern of mine before jumping in with a bunch more drives. Perhaps you are right, I should go solo once this happens, or just join ninja, something like that would probably work I will fit the criteria without issue.

@haitch I don't want any arguments but it shouldn't be a case of "someone" is missing so no one knows what's going on. If you can't see exactly what's happening in your own pools' accountability then I obviously have a twisted idea of what transparency really is. I look forward to @catbref returning, if it ever happens.

@haitch Well I've done the calculations, however due to the story changing in this circus time after time I can't really use it as evidence. That being said, the results I have are still out. Sorry if you are taking this personally, but I find it amusing that BURST literally has no accountability and thus transparency. How can I ever work it out? I don't think it's ever going to be possible.

Even if I was to prove my point who is going to do anything about it? Where would I take the issue? I suppose no one really knows. Funny that.

@haitch Can you observe whether block 331148 calculated historical shares 4 blocks afterwards or at the time of completion?

@haitch Really? Another part of the process that has no transparency? Not surprised to be honest.

If you could run that query when you find the time it would be appreciated. I'll factor in the block fees in multiple ways and see what happens.

@RichBC said in pool.burst-team.us payout confusion:

@BurstMiner1 All I am saying is that the displayed Reward Columns, Current and Historic add up to 60% & 40% of 2103.

Ok thanks Rich. I suppose the consensus is that only haitch can answer where block fees factor in as the setup is different from pool to pool?

@RichBC said in pool.burst-team.us payout confusion:

@iKnow0 @BurstMiner1 I am not sure if this affects your calculation but the Total Reward in the Current and Historic Share Columns does not include the Transaction Fee, they add up to the Block Reward - the Pool Fee of 2% (2146 * 0.98 = 2103)

Rich

Ok so just to be clear that reward of 2103 is the set maximum reward to be split between historical and current, as the pool fees are the first adjustment? The "Transaction Fees" are a second adjustment? 2103 - block fees = the 60/40 ratio for current and historic respectively? If not where do the block fees adjust any total?

@iKnow0

I have also questioned the accountability of the system. If you read this whole thread you will see what I mean. If those functions were put in place then it would make life a lot easier.