Blago's Burst-Miner (Win)
-
Which unit of time does "TargetDeadline" use?
-
@Akito seconds
-
This is the miner that is inside of the burst wallet 0.3.9.7 correct?
-
@sevencardz Carrizo amd and ryzen chips do indeed have avx2
-
I can also confirm that the min er crashes at night.
Any solutions available?
-
This post is deleted!
-
@Lorby if you use v1.170601 at v3 ninja pools - miner will crash (pools bug).
update to v1.170603 https://github.com/Blagodarenko/miner-burst/releases/tag/v1.170603
-
@Blago Hey I'm new to mining and I was tinkering with the settings on your miner today trying to find out what the commands do and all of a sudden a message appeared in the miner that said something like "Recommended size for this block is 6978GB" how did I make that message appear and what does it mean. Does it somehow calculate this from the current difficulty or something? Would be interesting to see how the recommendation changes with increase in difficulty. I was mining on lex at the time in case that is of importance.
Thanks in advance, Wes :)
-
@Weswyn if you hit 'r' key - miner will show "Recommended size" for current block at that pool.
If you have "Recommended size" plots - you will get minimum 1 deadline for block (avg)
-
@Blago v1.170603 works on all CPUs right? It automatically uses AVX and AVX2 instruction sets as per availabilty right? Also any OS requirements apart from x64?
-
@Blago Curious question here, I am using v1.170603_AVX and get roughly 80MB/s reading speeds, today I tried the GPU miner and now get roughly 160MB/s speeds, why such a dramatic difference in speed reading the same plots?
CPU: E5-1650
GPU: 1050 TIone thing I have noticed from others who post screen captures, is their CPU is being almost 100% consumed when they are reading, while mine seems to stop at 66% usage... is this possibly the result of using AVX instead of AVX2 since my CPU does not support the AVX2 instruction set? wondering if thats my issue...
when I use crystaldisk to check my drive performance, I can easily sustain 230MB/s read and writes sequentially, so in theory I've got the ability to go higher but I can't seem to get past the 80MB/s mark using the AVX version... now I'm wondering if the version not marked AVX or AVX2 would change anything, guess I'll have to try that later whenever this next plot finishes up...
-
@Darkbane
80MB/s - it's reading + calculating speedE5-1650 - 12 cores (HT)
1050 TI - 768 shading units
