How many peers am I connect to?
-
@nixxda if you dont mind testing this for me, it teoretically should simplify all that stack leaving only error and its explanation. Thats assuming i got it right ;)
https://github.com/LithMage/burstcoin/tree/b-simple_log_trace this is the branch with altered code (two files altered)
-
@LithStud i will test that commit for you.
-
@damncourier yes, got the same error but without all the "FINE" messages! I always had to restart the wallet after poping off blocks.
I stopped my linux server for now and set the console to FINE on my windows machine. so far nothing.....!-)@LithStud I'll do that in a bit!-) wanna see if I get 1 Wallet running first!
-
@nixxda its so small i can barely make out ddns? :D
-
@LithStud little bit better better?! no NRS, no platform??
-
@nixxda a lot :)
hes either blocking somehow outgoing messages (but then we probably wouldnt be able to see him), has altered client and removed its identification, or straight up built new one (least likely)
-
@LithStud didn't compile for me
burstcoin-b-simple_log_trace$ ./compile.sh src/java/nxt/util/Logger.java:170: error: method doLog in class Logger cannot be applied to given types; doLog(Level.INFO, message); ^ required: Level,String,Exception found: Level,String reason: actual and formal argument lists differ in length Note: Some input files use unchecked or unsafe operations. Note: Recompile with -Xlint:unchecked for details. 1 errorEDIT: looking for your revision now... compiles. let you know when i get a block not accepted out of it.
-
@damncourier thanks thats what i thought :) need to make some changes (sucks i cant do compilation at the moment)
EDIT: Pushing update :D i am moron :D forgot to add null at the end lol
-
@LithStud fudged the time for this one but regardless the java exception trace is out of the log. here is what i got:
2017-02-22 14:30:13 INFO: Block not accepted 2017-02-22 14:30:14 FINE: Ignoring peer broadcast block with ID 17477568179279197553. Already exists in queue
-
@damncourier ahh expected there to be a reason, but i guess when implementing exception they didnt add the ability to take out message from it, welp at least it didnt break anything :) so its fine as is :)
-
@LithStud yeah from the code i was expecting the same but it isn't long and scary looking so, um problem solved right?
i am still at a loss on that error i am getting on FINE logging that seems to indicate new blocks are not being excepted and the wallet being stuck. hoping to get someone to confirm the error and the behavior.
-
@damncourier yea not sure whats that one about
-
again! stuck at 331025
2017-02-22 21:19:54 SEVERE: Block not accepted nxt.BlockchainProcessor$BlockOutOfOrderException: Invalid timestamp: 80072496 current time is 80072394, previous block timestamp is 80072256 at nxt.BlockchainProcessorImpl.pushBlock(BlockchainProcessorImpl.java:849) at nxt.BlockchainProcessorImpl.access$400(BlockchainProcessorImpl.java:45) at nxt.BlockchainProcessorImpl$3.run(BlockchainProcessorImpl.java:194) at java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Unknown Source) at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.runAndReset(Unknown Source) at java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.access$301(Unknown Source) at java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.run(Unknown Source) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(Unknown Source) at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(Unknown Source) at java.lang.Thread.run(Unknown Source)and
2017-02-22 21:21:37 FINE: Ignoring peer broadcast block with ID 1987479303904250709. Already exists in queuetime sync was turned of for a moment today! but nothing major

gona try harder!-/
-
@nixxda its not stuck ;)
-
@LithStud yeah, something fishy! UI is stuck thou! unfortunately I forgot to "http://127.0.0.1:8125/burst?requestType=getBlockchainStatus"
-
@nixxda its not stuck per say, its just revert to normal 30s check too early for some reason (well basically it thinks done syncing now check normally:)
-
Maybe same time. Plus all day today a lot of block not accepted. Last time I saw that was in 1.2.6 wallet and it
went away for me with the 1.2.7 wallet
-
Well as soon as I added a new wallet 1.2.8 now I get this block not accepted which means sooner or later I will loose this database too
-
@Burstde no you wont, i had not accepted blocks both in previous and this current version :) never had problems with db ;) and my pc had crashed more than once when client was running ;)
-
@lithstud Not really sure you realize running a pool makes a difference......... as I can tell you pool is forked now


