Burst4All concerns
-
@mathew thanks, just waiting for a response now
-
@rapidfireman said in Burst4All concerns:
@mathew thanks, just waiting for a response now
Here is his response before I deleted mine it still seems sketchy but we will never find out really

-
@mathew he just linked me to that thread
-
This post is deleted!
-
@Han-Solo I haven't seen any scamming out of these 2 but it's just an odd scene going on.
-
@Han-Solo Kind of inclined to agree with you; This community is tearing itself apart.
-
@LithStud ok, here is a question for you:
I will get examples from the video .
Let's say a miner (call it JEFF) leaves .US pool because his sense tells him to go to another pool and goes to .CLUB
Let's say .US pool finds a block and JEFF is churning away at .CLUB for 1:30 mins not knowing what happens at .US
Let's say .US finds another in that 1:30 ... .CLUB knows nothing about the previous block and JEFF's work was for nothing for block(s)...Now, JEFF thought he was sensible but he got screwed by pool owner at .US and could do nothing about it. So, what our sensible JEFF should do?
my point is, you can be as sensible as you want if pools are not synced that is just not cool and causing all kind of problems. Now, -again just going by the video - it seems that the pools hosted by @haitch having problems and the rest is in sync. Imho , if a pool owner doesn't want to be in sync, they should close that pool(s) and let the rest of the pools work in sync (again, I don't care about personal wars , all I care about is Burst -as should every pool owner- and my investment in Burst)
-
@Han-Solo let me know whats your experience with storj ;) i wanted to try it at some point but suspected my upload might be a limiting factor, BURST in retroscpect uses small packets and just occasionally :)
SIA i think i mined for a while with GPU but maybe i am confusing it with another coin.
-
Storj is great, but it takes a real small amount of storage every so many days. I have it running for weeks now and only filled 25gb worth of space. its not a coin where you invest 20TB of harddrives for. but slowly and steadily it fills up, and the payout is worth it :)
-
This post is deleted!
-
@thomeefl69 you see the problem here neither i nor you know who is in the wrong. Since, and i might be wrong as i am no good at networking stuff, if blacklists one pool another it should look like the same since tx needs to go throu another nodes before reaching the one who blacklisted another. As i said i am no good in networking so probably what i said is nonsense :D
-
@LithStud yeah, my take is: enough of this "war" crap, fix what is broken and go back to build Burst .
-
@Han-Solo said in Burst4All concerns:
@rapidfireman Of course they scam people. How in the hell you call that when You present a project being genuine but: 1 Adam is giving pennies to so many happy morons just to get back 10 times more through gambling and here, 2 Haitch is not broadcasting to the network when his pools hit a block. Now I see a 1 minute and 20 second and is for real. Go solo and You will see.
Im confused here. How can Adam be scamming if he is giving away lots of his winnings and earnings. That doesnt make sense. What does he gain from that?
-
@Han-Solo I don't have any storage to solo with 😂
-
@LithStud said in Burst4All concerns:
@Gibsalot well they handled it as shitty as possible :) and adam showed his colors treating others like shit if they are not with him or even rises valid questions about asset :) i think i have a screenshot somewhere if you guys cant visit that place :)
As for my comment about shitty handling i already sold my shares so no idea what to do with those tokens.
Did this relate to the discussion I had with Focus and Adam regarding the procedures of this asset-redistribution? Cause If so then I must indeed say that the level of professionalism from Adam was not at the highest standard, so to say. Focus did his best to kind of clean it up though, but It's still a very shady deal that I hate to see happen, and do totally not agree with.
Kind of hurts my overall trust in burst
-
@jj1k They were never blocked at the router - I was so pissed I forgot to apply the rule to the interface.
And I didn't say they hacked my server, I said they caused my pool wallets to crash - and they know how to do that.
-
@thomeefl69 And the reverse is happening - more than once I've seen 3 of my pools "win" the Block, but the network not accept the Block, and Ninja win it. This is not something I'm doing - this is a problem with the network.
-
@newsense2004 said in Burst4All concerns:
@thomeefl69 said in Burst4All concerns:
well, here is my take as an investor :
@haitch stated something and Adam defended himself. Without this video it was a "he said - he said" situation . The video shows what happened (as far as I know @haitch did not react yet, so just have to go by what was shown) .Since I read both sites I know that Adam's team is willing to resolve Burst4all asset issues and - as an investor- that is all I care about.
I am a bit more concerned about the other video revealing something puzzling with some pools potentially screwing a bunch of miners and (according to the video) causing the network issues - the pools are hosted by @haitch (again, going only by the video).
other video is here if someone wants to check it out:
Just to note and help keep this all in context the voice on the video is goodplanets lex. One of the asset owners along with Haitch, Adam, Focus and Crowetic.
Just to clarify, that is not @goodplanets-lex's ( @goodplanets ) voice in the video. newsense2004's claim is patently false. It does sound just like Adam's voice, however. Has the Canadian long-O sound and everything.
I now have zero confidence in anything @newsense2004 says. I'm starting to see why even the deplorables don't want him.
-
@sevencardz I missed this one - just to clarify for the record I am not and never have been an owner of the Burst4All asset. I have shares, but am not an "owner".
-
Seems to me like @Han-Solo is the canary in the coal mine here my peeps. @haitch can you address his concerns?
With the network apparently at a nearly 50/50 split, there are obvious reasons for so many forks - transactions are only being broadcast among the competing "networks." Doesn't the solution seem obvious??? Sync up!



