Burst4All concerns
-
This post is deleted!
-
@thomeefl69 said in Burst4All concerns:
well, here is my take as an investor :
@haitch stated something and Adam defended himself. Without this video it was a "he said - he said" situation . The video shows what happened (as far as I know @haitch did not react yet, so just have to go by what was shown) .Since I read both sites I know that Adam's team is willing to resolve Burst4all asset issues and - as an investor- that is all I care about.
I am a bit more concerned about the other video revealing something puzzling with some pools potentially screwing a bunch of miners and (according to the video) causing the network issues - the pools are hosted by @haitch (again, going only by the video).
other video is here if someone wants to check it out:
Just to note and help keep this all in context the voice on the video is goodplanets lex. One of the asset owners along with Haitch, Adam, Focus and Crowetic.
-
Well, we can only wait for haitch's response to those films. I don't care about 1st as it shows nothing of value just Adam bsing for few mins. The one with pools is more interesting. If it really is true then that is why we have network problem.
-
@newsense2004 Doesn't mean is not true, both this video and Adam video only show proof.
@newsense2004 your downvotes also don't change the facts.
-
@newsense2004 that is fine with me...
again, as an investor all I care about is that the video shows a problem that is puzzling and -imho- should be fixed . who's voice it is irrelevant to me...
-
16:01 Actually, the deal is not complete. He did not open the file. Haitch has a right to say no after reviewing items transferred to him. To put into context, it's kind of like accepting disclosures for a house. You have a certain amount of time to review everything before you can officially say that you want to move forward. Haitch reviewed the items sent to him and decided to not go forward with the transaction. He is within his rights to do so. Also, the deal could not have been fully completed because critical information was hidden from view and was within a zip file.
Now, if haitch did open the file, accepted the transfer, but later decided he wanted to return everything, then he would be at fault.
-
@socalguy After receiving the password, who can prove he didn't open the file? I think that is the concern :/ they don't want to keep it now that haitch can possibly have all the access to it. It's understandable, if someone had my passphrase for my asset because of an agreement, I will never touch that wallet again.
-
@Zeus said in Burst4All concerns:
@socalguy After receiving the password, who can prove he didn't open the file? I think that is the concern :/ they don't want to keep it now that haitch can possibly have all the access to it. It's understandable, if someone had my passphrase for my asset because of an agreement, I will never touch that wallet again.
They can move funds to new wallets and create new passwords. It's inconvenient but a good measure.
-
I'll take control of the asset. Send me the zip. As an original member of the team it makes sense.
-
@mathew Just wondering what the botshop is on his bookmark bar during Adams video. Doesn't sound good to me.
Especially if the HF stands for Hack Forums?

-
@thomeefl69 said in Burst4All concerns:
well, here is my take as an investor :
@haitch stated something and Adam defended himself. Without this video it was a "he said - he said" situation . The video shows what happened (as far as I know @haitch did not react yet, so just have to go by what was shown) .Since I read both sites I know that Adam's team is willing to resolve Burst4all asset issues and - as an investor- that is all I care about.
I am a bit more concerned about the other video revealing something puzzling with some pools potentially screwing a bunch of miners and (according to the video) causing the network issues - the pools are hosted by @haitch (again, going only by the video).
other video is here if someone wants to check it out:
I have seen this also the other way round these days. It just shows that the pools are not as well connected as it should be. I hope none of the pool owners are blacklisting other pools.
They should put each other in "wellKnownPeers" and be sure their clocks are in sync. Also as luxe mentioned in another thread the club mining pool and the ninja pool maybe run on the same node. I hope this is not true, too.
On the other hand running multiple pools from one internal network is not optimal and never was.
-
@Zeus Yes, you are correct. Yet, that is a risk Adam took to transfer the asset. As newsense said, burst id's can be recreated for the asset. As frustrating and bullshit that would be, Adam and his team can easily take care of that.
What I am more concerned right now is that private information was revealed without the consent of another.
-
@newsense2004 said in Burst4All concerns:
I'll take control of the asset. Send me the zip. As an original member of the team it makes sense.
As an original member of the team, its interesting that you werent chosen over haitch if there is so much bad blood between them. That kinda raises alarm bells with me in regards to you wanting to run it.
-
@Gibsalot Just making sure that we are on the same page and the math is correct. Always divide payout by shares owned to find correct ratio.
-
@jj1k once Adam came many accusations were made towards me. He was not an original part of the plan.
-
@newsense2004 you are lazy, that's not an accusation, it's a fact. I remember the big discussions on your thread, loved that thread :(
-
@Zeus OK. I won't even argue with you. I was given no direction and had limited resources. You know shit.
-
@kmaxkmax yep i know that could of been me being sleepy or distracted or in haste but i did enter them into the calculator in the wrong order :)
-
This post is deleted!
-
@gumbogumbo Yeah I'm not even going to bother, he's probably going to take the video down too and start accusing me of forging.





