pool.burst-team.us payout confusion
-
@BurstMiner1 did you include the block fee in your calculations?
-
@BurstMiner1 said in pool.burst-team.us payout confusion:
@haitch Ok so my calculations are as follows
Block 331119
Current: 0.22
Historical: 1.87Payout before fee 2.09 BURST. 209000000 (This number is probably higher but cannot get that information)
209000000 x .98 for fee adjustment gives 204820000 or 2.04820000 BURST.Am I correct in assuming 193734903 is 1.93734903 BURST? The difference would be 0.11085097 BURST? Around 5% difference?
Let me know if my assumptions are incorrect I may be missing something crucial. Thanks.
@iKnow0 See for yourself.
-
@BurstMiner1 not the pool fee, the block reward+fees associated with the block
-
@iKnow0 Yep. I did put a note at the bottom saying "Let me know if my assumptions are incorrect"
Where can I find the block fee for that block? Is it spread across all reward recipients?
-
@iKnow0 If it is spread across all recipients that would be something like 5% of 2164? Would that be the correct assumption of a block fee? That would be around 108.2 BURST across the winning pool payout recipients.
-
-
@BurstMiner1
Current 2.8743792
Historic 16.2881988is what i calculated
-
@BurstMiner1 what was your deferred payment before and after the block payment
-
@iKnow0 So "Transaction Fees" are the block fees? 76 Burst?
2146 / 76 = 28.23684210526316
So the fees should account for less than the 5% difference I have above.
-
@iKnow0 The deferred was 2 BURST before payment, and 4 afterwards. I can't get any decimal places on that.
-
@BurstMiner1
yes 76
so 2146+76 = 2222 (total payment received by pool for the block)2222 *.98 = 2177.56 (less the pool fee of 2%)
2177.56 * .6 = 1306.536 (total pool current share percentage)
2177.56 * .4 = 871.024 (total pool historic percentage)
1306.536 * 0.0022 = 2.8743792 (your share of the total current share percentage)
871.024 * 0.0187 = 16.2881488 (your share of the total historic share percentage)
so you should have got 2.8743792+16.2881488 = 19.162528
after four blocks
this is my understanding, if this is incorrect please let me know
for block #331119
-
@iKnow0 Hang on, is this for the block 331119? Or have you jumped to help with my query on 331148?
-
@iKnow0 said in pool.burst-team.us payout confusion:
@BurstMiner1
yes 76
so 2146+76 = 2222 (total payment received by pool for the block)2222 *.98 = 2177.56 (less the pool fee of 2%)
2177.56 * .6 = 1306.536 (total pool current share percentage)
2177.56 * .4 = 871.024 (total pool historic percentage)
1306.536 * 0.0022 = 2.8743792 (your share of the total current share percentage)
871.024 * 0.0187 = 16.2881488 (your share of the total historic share percentage)
so you should have got 2.8743792+16.2881488 = 19.162528
after four blocks
this is my understanding, if this is incorrect please let me know
for block #331119So you are saying I should have got 19.162528 BURST on block 331119? That's interesting. @haitch has something much lower and my screenshots would also disagree with that.
-
@BurstMiner1 this is the way i understand it works, i could be mistaken
-
@iKnow0 said in pool.burst-team.us payout confusion:
@BurstMiner1
yes 76
so 2146+76 = 2222 (total payment received by pool for the block)2222 *.98 = 2177.56 (less the pool fee of 2%)
2177.56 * .6 = 1306.536 (total pool current share percentage)
2177.56 * .4 = 871.024 (total pool historic percentage)
1306.536 * 0.0022 = 2.8743792 (your share of the total current share percentage)
871.024 * 0.0187 = 16.2881488 (your share of the total historic share percentage)
so you should have got 2.8743792+16.2881488 = 19.162528
after four blocks
this is my understanding, if this is incorrect please let me know
for block #331119I think you messed up your decimal places.
@haitch has this query 193734903
I assume you mean 19162528xThe x is a decimal place to bring it more in line. Even so a difference still exists.
-
@BurstMiner1 what do you mean? query??
i was working off
Block 331119
Current: 0.22
Historical: 1.87you have to be careful, its best to do this with a block that takes a long time 15min+ , as some miners can submit deadlines very late especially if mining while plotting. A late deadline would change all the %'s
-
@haitch told me that he would be able to run an sql query to get my exact payout for that block, which is provided above.
I was very careful. Do you have any idea how long it takes waiting for blocks to be written ready with finger on the button to grab a screenshot. I've spent hours on this. And when I do believe a mistake was made or potentially the information was wrong I dumped those records. I have 2 samples to test and I am still waiting on the query for the second. As soon as that is supplied I will tune my calculations for block fees and report back. Though I still believe an issue exists. Thanks very much for the help. Surprised other were unable to advise on the block fees, just goes to show.
-
@BurstMiner1 i examined it before and it seemed correct, but each pool is different so who know's.
-
I have also questioned the accountability of the system. If you read this whole thread you will see what I mean. If those functions were put in place then it would make life a lot easier.
-
@BurstMiner1 yes i agree. In accounting the system of double entry is used to verify calculations. I suggested to some pool operators before to do reverse calculations based on payouts to check that everything balances. So that neither the pool operator or pool miners lose out.

