www.BURSTNation.com Making it Rain



  • @sevencardz smart guy


  • admin

    @sevencardz That's exactly how it is designed. When you have a time-critical transaction to go through, change the fee to 2 or more Burst.

    Hopefully at some point in the future the max transactions per block are really too low and we need to have a solution ready that is smart enough to grow with the network, so we don't have to increase it manually with each new version.

    (Increasing the maximum transactions is a hard fork. So we better do this only once with a solution that can adjust itself)

    @RichBC That Asset transactions only use 1 Burst for fee is actually a GUI problem. This can be taken care of very easily.
    Edit: Ops, I'm blind. There is the option to change the fee in the Asset Exchange.



  • @daWallet said in www.BURSTNation.com Making it Rain:

    @RichBC That Asset transactions only use 1 Burst for fee is actually a GUI problem. This can be taken care of very easily.

    I see it now, don't know how I missed it....

    So presumably if two transactions have the same fee then when they were submitted determines which one is carried in a Block, but if one is higher than the other the larger fee takes precedence? Can you use decimals on fees? :-)

    Rich



  • Well,
    Is this the reason that I haven't been able to find a block since these transactions started.
    Cause seriously the day that I received the first of these small amounts of bursts i stopped mining and receiving the usual pool rewards?



  • blocks are random. Some people get a bunch at once whilst others don't get any for ages. Blocks aaren't to live on but they give a rush when won.



  • I don't have a problem with a small chunk of Bursts randomly going into my wallet from someone who is spamming me with ads.

    Heck, I'll treat it just like a Youtube Ad. It's there, I can see it, I can read it, and I understand what they are trying to do. But I'm still not going to click on it or visit the site that has more information regarding it. Thank you though. :)

    Oh, and please don't stop sending me Bursts, I like it. :)



  • thanks everybody for making an interesting and productive discussion out of this! (silly me!)

    So now I understand why I was not able to payout dividends last night! I tried twice and they always got suck and than vanished!

    @daWallet there's a field in "Dividends+" which shows the fees but you cant change it! Feature-request!-)

    maybe @LithStud will also add it to his lovely and very fast "Dividends system (BETA)" which I've been trying out!-)



  • @nixxda oh someone uses it :D be carefull as its intended for assets with no decimal points ;) and if you need the fee setting i can add it no problem :)



  • @LithStud yes I'm occasionally checking what nice thing you came up with while nobody was looking!-)
    and I'm aware of the lack of decimals. But thanks for mentioning! I'm only using it for my private little distribution asset (and I hate decimals anyway!-)

    PS. even my Polo account holds some of this asset!-) yes you can do that! But you'll be never able to transfer them out of there again!



  • @daWallet maybe a hash of all previous blocks would allow for a thin client, so after each block is created a hash of all previous is also stored. It would also allow for reverse build of the db. Just a thought...



  • Does anyone know anything about Pascal's deletable blockchain?



  • Guys it's free money, just be happy lol



  • I'm going to try to address many questions in a single thread in the form of a question/answer block, I may not address everything listed above but I'll do my best.

    Q: My asset orders seem hung, is that because of all the block transactions
    A: Yes, an asset buy or sell or transfer counts as a standard transactions, transactions are given priority by two factors. First is the transaction fee (default is 1) the highest transactions fees are spotted by the nodes and processed first 2) Blocks with the same transaction fee are rated by the submit time. So actions with equal fees are rated on a first come first server bases. EVERY block chain request goes through this process some of the items include; Faucet Claims, Dividend Payouts, Asset Buy, Sell or Transfer, sending Burst to or From Polo or another wallet.

    Q: Can this be fixed?
    A: It can but it's probably low priority. As PASCAL coin was mentioned they have solved the problem of the ever expanding block chain DB by pruning it back to only relevant data. Our problem is no different that the current problem with BTC transaction fees. If you want to feel pain try sending someone BTC but check the box that says "Only pay required transaction fee" which I believe is 1000 Sats. The time for your money to leave the wallet is instant, the time for it to reach the other wallet as a confirmed transaction will be somewhere in the neighborhood of 90 to 120 days!

    Q: How do I change the Fee for Transaction type X
    A: It sounds like were going to keep @daWallet busy with some updates to the AIO. This is a problem that we thought could happen, just didn't take the energy to correct and issue that didn't exist some time ago. I'm sure their will be a new version of the wallet with the ability to globally set the transaction fee or on a per transaction basis.

    Q: Does this affect my ability to mine blocks?
    A: No, this issue we are discussing has nothing to do with mining other than the fact miners will receive higher payouts for transactions per block.

    -IceBurst



  • I thought the wallet already asked how much of a fee you want to put......Am I wrong?



  • @socal said in www.BURSTNation.com Making it Rain:

    I thought the wallet already asked how much of a fee you want to put......Am I wrong?

    It does for some basic transactions, not for all offered operations.



  • hmm, I kind a like the sound of people wanting to pay more fees to get their transactions processed faster!-)



  • ok, I'll take the "click-bait" back! This is starting to look more and more like an attack on the network!! setting an "Reward assignment" now takes more then 10 blocks!
    What exactly is the purpose of this? Are you testing something? Pleas enlighten us!
    Or just send 50Burst at a time! Then you'll be done faster!-)



  • @nixxda make that a 1000 and get over with it xD



  • @nixxda Yes at first it was Innovative, surprising, nice to have, and exposed a couple of flaws in the network.

    Now I am confused, what is the point of continuing other than just showing off how much Burst you have? Trouble is it's the equivalent of throwing Cent Coins out of the window which can be painful.

    Rich



  • @RichBC it's called SPAM nothing more than this, and it start to be not funny


Log in to reply
 

Looks like your connection to Burst - Efficient HDD Mining was lost, please wait while we try to reconnect.