We now have a Burst wikipedia article !
-
This post is deleted!
-
@kmaxkmax ok now it just looks like an ad at the end of the sentence like that
-
This post is deleted!
-
Communication features such as encrypted blockchain messaging, Burstcoin Forums, BurstNation and bitcointalk.org platforms offer many means for its user base to interact.
-
I think what we have to ask ourselves here is : "is this information meaningful, useful and worthy of being in an encyclopedia ?"
In my opinion it's not. It just feels like an advertisement. I think writing this article is difficult because of our vested interests !
-
I think these communication features are meaningful, however, we need to look at it from an objective vantage point.
-
@k.coins I agree, but I mean I don't think naming both forums and having their links is meaningful here.
-
@Gadrah_ Communication features such as encrypted blockchain messaging, forums, and online hubs offer many means for its user base to interact.
-
@k.coins Nice :)
-
Sweet! Problem solved. - Hopefully
-
Awesome @gadrah, glad to see it up and running. :)
-
BTW I didn't know about the mysterious Burstcoin man! That's really cool indeed.
-
@Gadrah_ well done
-
-
@LithStud Thank you :) But I was not alone on this project ! In particular, @iKnow0 has done a great work and the article wouldn't be where it is now without him. So @nameless, can you give him a cookie as well ? :)
-
@Gadrah_ said in We now have a Burst wikipedia article !:
@LithStud Thank you :) But I was not alone on this project ! In particular, @iKnow0 has done a great work and the article wouldn't be where it is now without him. So @nameless, can you give him a cookie as well ? :)
you both get cookies provided that i get your addresses :)
-
i think thats a great idea! It will help spred the word and explain people why it is worth to buy some!
-
Fun fact : during yesterday's edit war, Palmaris was banned from editing the article : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Palmaris
On a more serious note, the article has apparently been reviewed by serious wikipedia members and a few parts that seemed promotional or without references have been removed, including the section about the forums.
Please don't try to put it back there as we don't want any negative attention from moderators to our article. Thanks.
-
@Gadrah_ Awesome work on the wiki article - love it.
And LMAO that Palmaris got banned for vandalism.
Edit And even more so that the Wikipedia Editors say that these forums are the Official ones!
-
Interesting that it got removed after all that... I thought the encrypted messaging feature was worth mentioning though. Would you guys mind if I tried to work it in somewhere else?



