We now have a Burst wikipedia article !
-
@Gadrah_ thnks a lot for that great job, to you and the ones involved! As you said this is a quite significatn step to Burst!
Regarding the Forums, please let's be mature about this. There can be as many forums out there as people wish, is this now a fight for centralized forum control? Both forums can be listed and if a third comes could it also be include IMO. But agree with @Gadrah_ here, that quote is completely unnecessary and really immature. Think that this is going to be the first thing that probably most people will read.
-
@qibucks lol i added one line inthe asset section, couldn't resist..haha i love it..
-
@qibucks that is a description of the asset (it is a Wikipedia article), I don't think a "disclaimer" is that necessary in my opinion...
-
@vExact haha is not bad though, i wrote the main positive though that it's an added asset to burst lol
-
Should I wait till things cool down to contribute to this? I'm seeing several grammatically awkward phrasings now...
-
@k.coins You could always edit the grammar ;)
-
@k.coins Several persons are currently trying to edit the "history" section in order to make their side look like the official one. I guess we still have to find a phrasing that suits both parties.
-
@rapidfireman @Gadrah_ haha word. I just don't want to edit grammar that is in the middle of such rapid edits.
Learning a lot from the other content though! Really great work! Advertise that donation wallet, I'll send some more =P
-
We could just say the burst community is flourishing with multiple forums at it's disposal which brings in tons of eager people wanting to get into this amazing cryptocurrency. Why does this have to be a fight?
-
I'm with @rapidfireman on this. We just have to say there are several forums without going into details. But please remember a wikipedia article is meant to be written from a neutral point of view so avoid everything that seems promotional when there are no references to back it :)
-
@Gadrah_ I will be editing the grammar for you now on the article and before anyone says anything : I WILL NOT EDIT THE FORUM SECTION UNLESS THERE ARE GRAMMAR MISTAKES.
-
This post is deleted!
-
This post is deleted!
-
@kmaxkmax In my opinion neither should be linked. Anyway, the way it is put now is not up to wikipedia's standards :
An official Burstcoin forum has just recently been launched with a mission to ensure that Burst utilises it maximum capacity to grow
We can't say that because it's not neutral and impossible to back with references.
-
This post is deleted!
-
If you find a way to introduce both in a non controversial and non promotional way that pleases everyone then please do :)
-
This post is deleted!
-
I liked the hub version... But on a more serious note, this is a decentralized value exchange platform, why do we even need to mention either website in such an explicit way? IMO mention of either is irrelevant unless linked and referenced to a specific fact.
-
This post is deleted!
-
@kmaxkmax yeah, ok that's good. One question though, why just two? The community is much larger than that.
"The BurstCoin community currently has 2 different forums at its disposal..."



