Pool mining is very uneffective for me....
-
@schnebi sure go solo ... pool payout algo can never be perfectly fair for all i guess ... 2 min round time is a bit high, cause you are not able to check all your data on every round:
http://burstcoin.biz/charts/average-block-generation-time
-
@schnebi you should really work on those 2 minutes you are loosing many blocks because of this
-
- I've seen the same when I calculated for my miner
- Have you checked that all your dl's get confirmed by burst.ninja
- be careful when using burstcoin.biz for such calculations! sometimes there are bits missing from wallet dropouts! (and for example all "Subscription Payments" but the first)
- only time I've seen it the other way is when I was calculating @RichBC for something like Dezember I think!
- when calculating for @RichBC entire mining time it go's the other way again
- for both of those calculations above I was using the xml from burstcoin.biz!!
- I love you @RichBC!-) your my size!
- yes, you're probably feeding the others
- one more yes, your read time is ~longish which might make you loose on some blocks
- If you want all your dl's confirmed, espetially when your in europe, go tross
-
@RichBC I agree with your theory ("The Rich Theory") , i suppose you would have to look at the distribution of winning deadlines and see what percentage of them are less than your read time and then compare that to another miner of same capacity but with a much longer read time. The relative difference in the distribution percentages should account for any extra earnings. Interesting stuff for sure :-)
-
@ccminer said in Pool mining is very uneffective for me....:
@schnebi you should really work on those 2 minutes you are loosing many blocks because of this
Many blocks, really? He is reading 50TB in 30 seconds, the next 50TB in a minute. How many blocks are less than a minute? Of those how many would he have had a better DL. One, two maybe a year, IMO.
-
@rds but you also want to get your shares in! (in Time....)
and http://burstcoin.biz/charts/average-block-generation-time
-
So, I am mining burst for about one and a half month and I am only pool mining since then. And until now pool mining is about 25% less effetive than solo mining would have been. Check my stats:
I have the same results. I was solo mining and my local wallet was messing up so I decided to get into a pool that doesn't fork all the time (read Ninja), After 2 weeks I saw that I could have made 25% more solo mining. I fixed the local wallet but was too lazy to flip back. I'm going to swap over soon.
-
solomining gets kinda lonely after a while!-) and very much annoying when you've been on a fork for 1 1/2 days and did not realize!
also when you're simply out of luck for a few days!
and then there is the the thing with attracting new miners and making it worthwhile for them!I do switch quite often depending on how "greedy" and lucky I feel!-)
RichBC is our Exeption who confirms the rule!
-
@schnebi I just looked at my account, and it looks like I donated about 19% ( 2.25M Burst) to the other Pool Miners.
-
This post is deleted!
-
@Han-Solo I have a 10 drive miner and a 15 drive miner - they both read in under 30 seconds. didn't use to be so efficient though.
-
This post is deleted!
-
This post is deleted!
-
f***ck!!
@haitch I want an SSH tunnel to your decentec or something!
My setup might be optimized but its a unorganized noob setup! still, I can read 85TB@20sec or less! but I can't get all my dl's confirmed!! My real nice ISP with Gbit fiber seems to be worth nothing in this case!-/@Han-Solo I dont believe that its only speed that matters! Size does to!-) By that I mean that plot-sizes being so "equal" on burst.ninja helps alot. And then you have to be one lucky enough to get all confirmations! (and btw. openCL on your integrated GPU will read your plots even faster!)
and then, @all please make damn sure that if posting such numbers that your calculating them right! otherwise you'll make me angry!-) (and others)(possibly the ones you're leeching of!)
edit: if this sounded a bit angry, I'm not!-)
-
This post is deleted!