[ANN] CCMINER1000
-
@ccminer Out of curiosity, do you plan on doing anything once we plot the full 1.1pb? It's a substantial amount of "hashing" power. Just an idea, but you could open up a pool, point the "CCMINER100" & "CCMINER1000" assets at the pool (along with open to the public), and create an asset based on the pool fee.
-
@IncludeBeer after ccminer1000 I'm planning new a new project. The pool could be but I'm more in pure mining stuff, we will see I'll keep you guy updated.
By the way thx for the suggestion ;)
-
@ccminer Hey np at all. Glad to hear you have stuff in the pipeline. I'm sure the whole community will be perfectly happy if you just do your thang lol :D I'm excited to hear about a new project! Are we gonna see "CCMINER10000"??? :D
-
@IncludeBeer maybe ccminer10000 is a bit too much... but hey .....LOL.
By the way I operate one project at time to provide the best service possible due to my capabilities, so the new one will arrive when all the ccminer1000 shares will be sold out
-
@ccminer I'm waiting for ccminer10000000000000 :))))
-
I look forward to ccminer unlimited
-
@ccminer said in [ANN] CCMINER1000:
@IncludeBeer after ccminer1000 I'm planning new a new project. The pool could be but I'm more in pure mining stuff, we will see I'll keep you guy updated.
By the way thx for the suggestion ;)Solo mining is best for the asset. Mining in pool will leech the asset off unnecessary fees which in turn reduce payout for asset
-
@yellowduck said in [ANN] CCMINER1000:
Solo mining is best for the asset. Mining in pool will leech the asset off unnecessary fees which in turn reduce payout for asset
Not if it was pool.ccminer.com :-)
Rich
-
@yellowduck said in [ANN] CCMINER1000:
I look forward to ccminer unlimited
ehehe ccminer infinite LOL
-
@RichBC said in [ANN] CCMINER1000:
@yellowduck said in [ANN] CCMINER1000:
Solo mining is best for the asset. Mining in pool will leech the asset off unnecessary fees which in turn reduce payout for asset
Not if it was pool.ccminer.com :-)
Rich
There are already many good pools out there, I do not think that my own pool will bring benefits or innovations to BURST, so that's why it is not one of my priority right now
-
Question , if burst were to go to 1,000 sat, asset release sell at same price 10 burst per share , will ccminer buy more HDD since get way more BTC ?
-
@yellowduck I was thinking about it recently, and yes the price will remain the same but I'll get more drivers...
-
@ccminer said in [ANN] CCMINER1000:
@yellowduck I was thinking about it recently, and yes the price will remain the same but I'll get more drivers...
It make sense to do that.
Which means this asset got the potential to go beyond 1 PB. I will treat it as a bonus if that happens
-
@yellowduck yeah if the price will rise so much, could go beyond 1PB
-
@ccminer said in [ANN] CCMINER1000:
@yellowduck yeah if the price will rise so much, could go beyond 1PB
We can also say what if price goes down, u will get less from the release. Which means things might balance out or maybe not, but buying driver according to current cash out value is the correct and honest way to do it. Running a honest business and doing things logically goes a long way.
This asset could potentially be a very powerful asset if we accumulate lots of driver when price are high, those who brought in when burst price are low will benefit from the extra driver during high burst price. It's a very powerful long term asset.
Buying number of driver according to current cash out value is genius idea.
-
@yellowduck the same to get less the price should go down a lot
-
-
@qibucks this is the kind of spam I like ehehehe
-
@ccminer I will spam more when I do the blog review, haven't forgotten but it's Chinese New year so been busy a bit at home :)
-
MONDAY I'LL START TO PLOT THE NEW 105TB I'M GOING TO ADD TO THE ASSET!
HOPFULLY I'LL BE ABLE TO KEEP THE 20TB PER DAY RATE!!



