@gpedro Ah I see. I didn't know you were only allowed 1 poll per thread. that makes it a little tricky indeed. I think the solution you suggested works best then. and shows an overwhelming vote in favor of age verification.
Posts made by keyd0s
RE: [Poll] Age verification for Asset Issuers
From a psychological standpoint the option's don't make sense though.
The first 3 options fall under the category : age verification is needed, the details are as follows: ....
and the 4th option falls under the category: Age verification is not needed
If the 4th option gets 28% of the votes, and all the other options get 24%, then the decision is that verification is not needed. even though the majority would be against that. 72% is saying they do want verification, but haven't reached consensus of what what the right age is.
the third option is also kind of weird, but it makes more sense to post it as follows if you want to remain those categories
It's best to split those up in 2 polls, as you are practically asking 2 questions
Is age verification needed to filter out minors?
A - No
B - Yes
If voted yes, what would be counted as a minor
A - 20 or younger
B - 17 or younger
C - 17 or younger without parental consent (so with 17 with parental consent would be considered 'fine')
Not sure if question 2, option C is the way you meant to ask it, but that's how I interpreted it.
Just my 2 cents
RE: [ANN][LAUNCH] Energizer Mining Asset - Daily Dividends - (Verified by haitch)
@RichBC I think what Luke meant with that statement is that all the reputation he had build up, and capital he was trusted with would be gone. people would panic sell, making them lose money, and he lost all his reputation and credability in the burst scene. obviously the money is already in the asset so that won't change. the future of the asset however, is limited.
I think the only way to recover from this, is the same way CCMiner recovered from his coverup; to from now on be open and honest about EVERYTHING, and show us that this asset can be run in an adult way, even though in legal terms, it's not run by an adult (yet). Only time will make this asset recover, Time and dedication. I myself was quite invested in your asset, and will not sell any of these off, and even add some cheap shares I come across. regarding asset info you have always been open and honest, and I appreciate that.
(some pictures would be nice though, like Rich said)
Cheers man, And goodluck!
RE: [ANN] BtcDragon Casino Asset
33081067 btc , i still havent got internet at home cross fingers they will be here first thing and ill sort it out , there is also asset earnings and other earnings , i cant access alot of things on this so called smart phone hmmmm, but anyways thought i would just post it and let you all know what
Thanks for the headsup man! Highly appreciated
RE: Thank You Adam Guerbuez and Jason Crowe
@socal That simple, hey? Then you can post them in off-topic just as easily, and I won't have to see your posts when I'm trying to read about Burst related content.
Are you kidding me? If the leaders of a public burst forum with the highest amount of users is publicly throwing remarks like this around, I think that has everything to do with burst? How can you be so ignorant to deny that? I think he he has honestly every right to post about this publicly and let the world the know all the facts. I myself was already wondering what that message was about.