With all the issues I've been having with pools lately decided to try solo for the first time and hit a block within the first hour of mining and missed another by a min or so. Not bad...
Posts made by Garbear
-
RE: pool.ccminer.net:8080 new pool for big miners!!!posted in Pool Announcements
-
RE: pool.ccminer.net:8080 new pool for big miners!!!posted in Pool Announcements
@haitch very smooth, I actually won a block and almost a 2nd one. Man my payouts have be ass lately having to switch pools everyday. Thanks for ur guys hard work on keeping the pool running smoothly!
-
RE: pool.ccminer.net:8080 new pool for big miners!!!posted in Pool Announcements
@Han-Solo pool has definitely fallen in the ranks of daily blocks won cause of this issue I believe. I cringe thinking of blocks possibly won that deadlines were never sent :(
-
RE: pool.ccminer.net:8080 new pool for big miners!!!posted in Pool Announcements
@Han-Solo Yeah I've been fighting network issues for a couple days now thinking it was my connection. DL's not confirming and almost lost a block but I hurried up restarted the jminer and it submitted and won it, just happen to be sitting my my desk and seen it. Tried blagos miner and seen as low as 15% network quality. Changed pools and everything is zippy again, don't think I have enough plots to solo with close to 90tb's plus don't exactly know how lol.
-
RE: pool.ccminer.net:8080 new pool for big miners!!!posted in Pool Announcements
@rds yeah changing pools for now I need some burst lol.
-
RE: pool.ccminer.net:8080 new pool for big miners!!!posted in Pool Announcements
I'm guessing pool side....
504 Gateway Time-out now and still getting lots of connection timed outs...
-
RE: pool.ccminer.net:8080 new pool for big miners!!!posted in Pool Announcements
Anyone else getting these connection timeout issues? Is it the pool end or my end? I'm worried about missing deadlines being sent cause I get not confirmed warnings once in a while.
2017-06-18 21:21:27.114 INFO 6044 --- [ roundPool-1] burstcoin.jminer.JMinerCommandLine : START block '372607', scoopNumber '3891', capacity '89951 GB'
2017-06-18 21:21:27.130 INFO 6044 --- [ roundPool-1] burstcoin.jminer.JMinerCommandLine : targetDeadline '79200', baseTarget '373643'
2017-06-18 21:21:27.223 INFO 6044 --- [ readerPool-274] burstcoin.jminer.JMinerCommandLine : 1% done (0TB 249GB), avg.'86 MB/s'
2017-06-18 21:21:28.591 INFO 6044 --- [ readerPool-283] burstcoin.jminer.JMinerCommandLine : 12% done (10TB 116GB), avg.'1192 MB/s', eff.'1761 MB/s'
2017-06-18 21:21:29.880 INFO 6044 --- [ readerPool-274] burstcoin.jminer.JMinerCommandLine : 23% done (20TB 214GB), avg.'1468 MB/s', eff.'1912 MB/s'
2017-06-18 21:21:31.333 INFO 6044 --- [ readerPool-283] burstcoin.jminer.JMinerCommandLine : 34% done (30TB 67GB), avg.'1525 MB/s', eff.'1655 MB/s'
2017-06-18 21:21:32.765 INFO 6044 --- [ readerPool-286] burstcoin.jminer.JMinerCommandLine : 45% done (40TB 178GB), avg.'1570 MB/s', eff.'1723 MB/s'
2017-06-18 21:21:34.193 INFO 6044 --- [ readerPool-276] burstcoin.jminer.JMinerCommandLine : 56% done (50TB 57GB), avg.'1592 MB/s', eff.'1688 MB/s'
2017-06-18 21:21:35.708 INFO 6044 --- [ readerPool-276] burstcoin.jminer.JMinerCommandLine : 67% done (59TB 974GB), avg.'1593 MB/s', eff.'1598 MB/s'
2017-06-18 21:21:36.661 WARN 6044 --- [skExecutor-3042] b.j.c.n.t.NetworkRequestMiningInfoTask : Unable to get mining info from wallet, caused by connectionTimeout, currently '60 sec.' try increasing it!
2017-06-18 21:21:37.263 INFO 6044 --- [ readerPool-276] burstcoin.jminer.JMinerCommandLine : 78% done (70TB 87GB), avg.'1592 MB/s', eff.'1587 MB/s'
2017-06-18 21:21:39.270 INFO 6044 --- [ readerPool-286] burstcoin.jminer.JMinerCommandLine : 89% done (79TB 959GB), avg.'1531 MB/s', eff.'1200 MB/s'
2017-06-18 21:21:40.630 INFO 6044 --- [ roundPool-1] burstcoin.jminer.JMinerCommandLine : dl '35399' send (pool) [nonce '406071464']
2017-06-18 21:21:41.678 WARN 6044 --- [skExecutor-3047] b.j.c.n.t.NetworkRequestMiningInfoTask : Unable to get mining info from wallet, caused by connectionTimeout, currently '60 sec.' try increasing it!
2017-06-18 21:21:44.055 INFO 6044 --- [ readerPool-288] burstcoin.jminer.JMinerCommandLine : 100% done (89TB 951GB), avg.'1252 MB/s', eff.'509 MB/s'
2017-06-18 21:21:44.412 INFO 6044 --- [skExecutor-3106] burstcoin.jminer.JMinerCommandLine : dl '35399' confirmed! [ 0d 9h 49m 59s ]
2017-06-18 21:21:44.662 INFO 6044 --- [ roundPool-1] burstcoin.jminer.JMinerCommandLine : FINISH block '372607', best deadline '35399', round time '17s 892ms' -
RE: What pool should i use for my half petaposted in Mining & Plotting
@ccminer said in What pool should i use for my half peta:
@ChuckNorris what about THE pool for big miners!
pool.ccminer.net port 8080Yeah come aboard! When Chuck Norris does push ups, he isn't pushing himself up, he's pushing the earth down!
-
RE: Filled up half a PetaByte. Now What?posted in Mining & Plotting
@ChuckNorris My current mining rig is a asrock extreme 3 gen 3 with i5 2500k stocks speeds with 16gigs ddr3 ram and a GTX 960.
My new plotting and mining rig i'm still getting setup is a ASRock Fatal1ty X370 Professional Gaming AM4 AMD X370, ryzen 7 1700 and 16 gigs ddr4 ram. Plotting with xplotter atm with 12 of 16 threads is a little over 15k nonces/min
It's got 10 sata3 ports, 8 usb3 ports and 3 pci express x16 slots for my usb3 controller cards.
-
RE: Filled up half a PetaByte. Now What?posted in Mining & Plotting
@ChuckNorris Yeah optimizing will see a big gain in read speeds. It's been a while since I've plotted unoptimized then optimize them as I use xplotter now but if I remember it was close to double scan speeds after the optimizing.
-
RE: Filled up half a PetaByte. Now What?posted in Mining & Plotting
I would think running 7 drives off a hub would be a bottleneck. I have one of those usb3 cards with 4 dedicated controllers 1 per port. Each port has a usb3 hub but I don't run more than 2-3 drives per hub connected to each port. Using a GTX 960 and jminer these are my read speeds. These are optimized plots of 85tb so no where the space u have but my speeds are good fro what I'm told.
: START block '370042', scoopNumber '3287', capacity '84981 GB'
2017-06-11 17:35:15.203 INFO 7068 --- [ roundPool-1] burstcoin.jminer.JMinerCommandLine : targetDeadline '1209600', baseTarget '474378'
2017-06-11 17:35:15.479 INFO 7068 --- [readerPool-9317] burstcoin.jminer.JMinerCommandLine : 1% done (0TB 1GB), avg.'0 MB/s'
2017-06-11 17:35:17.571 INFO 7068 --- [ roundPool-1] burstcoin.jminer.JMinerCommandLine : dl '14368' send (pool) [nonce '112264519']
2017-06-11 17:35:17.976 INFO 7068 --- [readerPool-9315] burstcoin.jminer.JMinerCommandLine : 12% done (9TB 487GB), avg.'806 MB/s', eff.'927 MB/s'
2017-06-11 17:35:19.343 INFO 7068 --- [readerPool-9315] burstcoin.jminer.core.round.Round : dl '221704' queued
2017-06-11 17:35:20.161 INFO 7068 --- [readerPool-9329] burstcoin.jminer.JMinerCommandLine : 23% done (19TB 114GB), avg.'922 MB/s', eff.'1075 MB/s'
2017-06-11 17:35:22.317 INFO 7068 --- [readerPool-9317] burstcoin.jminer.JMinerCommandLine : 34% done (28TB 465GB), avg.'963 MB/s', eff.'1058 MB/s'
2017-06-11 17:35:23.996 INFO 7068 --- [Executor-146923] burstcoin.jminer.JMinerCommandLine : dl '14368' confirmed! [ 0d 3h 59m 28s ]
2017-06-11 17:35:24.306 INFO 7068 --- [readerPool-9323] burstcoin.jminer.JMinerCommandLine : 45% done (37TB 938GB), avg.'1006 MB/s', eff.'1162 MB/s'
2017-06-11 17:35:26.375 INFO 7068 --- [readerPool-9315] burstcoin.jminer.JMinerCommandLine : 56% done (47TB 312GB), avg.'1024 MB/s', eff.'1106 MB/s'
2017-06-11 17:35:28.402 INFO 7068 --- [readerPool-9321] burstcoin.jminer.JMinerCommandLine : 67% done (56TB 696GB), avg.'1040 MB/s', eff.'1130 MB/s'
2017-06-11 17:35:28.438 INFO 7068 --- [ roundPool-1] burstcoin.jminer.JMinerCommandLine : dl '1620' send (pool) [nonce '300063902']
2017-06-11 17:35:30.619 INFO 7068 --- [readerPool-9318] burstcoin.jminer.JMinerCommandLine : 78% done (66TB 204GB), avg.'1041 MB/s', eff.'1046 MB/s'
2017-06-11 17:35:31.718 INFO 7068 --- [Executor-146935] burstcoin.jminer.JMinerCommandLine : dl '1620' confirmed! [ 0d 0h 27m 0s ]
2017-06-11 17:35:32.866 INFO 7068 --- [readerPool-9321] burstcoin.jminer.JMinerCommandLine : 89% done (75TB 618GB), avg.'1039 MB/s', eff.'1022 MB/s'
2017-06-11 17:35:39.337 INFO 7068 --- [readerPool-9319] burstcoin.jminer.JMinerCommandLine : 100% done (84TB 981GB), avg.'856 MB/s', eff.'353 MB/s'
2017-06-11 17:35:39.588 INFO 7068 --- [ roundPool-1] burstcoin.jminer.JMinerCommandLine : FINISH block '370042', best deadline '1620', round time '24s 232ms' -
RE: Problem when plotting with XPlotterposted in Mining & Plotting
Sounds like the same drives I bought 7 of. They scan plots just as fast as any other drive I have but they plot like shit! After 3% or so the write speeds drop to 5-10mb/s at best. So I had to alter my plotting ways to smaller 1tb plots to drives that write at max speeds then move them to the 8tb seagate backup usb drives at full 100mb/s speeds, go figure!
-
At what point is a GPU maxed out speed wise mining?posted in Mining & Plotting
Just curious when a GPU is maxed out with read speeds?
My current mining rig which is also my daily driver if u will....
Asrock z68 gen3 extreme 3 motherboard
I5 2500k stock speeds
16gigs DDR ram
10x5tb USB3 drives
1x2tb sata int
2x3tb sata int
4x8tb USB3 drives soon to be 7I also have a couple USB3 add in cards to divide the speeds instead of all the drives using minimal usb ports, one of those cards is the kind that has 4 port 4 usb3 controller chips for fast speeds even when all ports being used. Pretty much anything after 12 drives I have seen no speed increase in read times so I'm sure something is holding me back.
: START block '369239', scoopNumber '3204', capacity '84981 GB'
2017-06-09 11:45:28.059 INFO 12080 --- [ roundPool-1] burstcoin.jminer.JMinerCommandLine : targetDeadline '79200', baseTarget '592120'
2017-06-09 11:45:28.352 INFO 12080 --- [ readerPool-262] burstcoin.jminer.JMinerCommandLine : 1% done (0TB 1GB), avg.'0 MB/s'
2017-06-09 11:45:30.740 INFO 12080 --- [ readerPool-273] burstcoin.jminer.JMinerCommandLine : 12% done (9TB 488GB), avg.'852 MB/s', eff.'969 MB/s'
2017-06-09 11:45:32.780 INFO 12080 --- [ readerPool-266] burstcoin.jminer.JMinerCommandLine : 23% done (19TB 8GB), avg.'975 MB/s', eff.'1139 MB/s'
2017-06-09 11:45:33.056 INFO 12080 --- [ roundPool-1] burstcoin.jminer.JMinerCommandLine : dl '29014' send (pool)
2017-06-09 11:45:33.318 INFO 12080 --- [skExecutor-3010] burstcoin.jminer.JMinerCommandLine : dl '29014' confirmed! [ 0d 8h 3m 34s ]
2017-06-09 11:45:34.880 INFO 12080 --- [ readerPool-262] burstcoin.jminer.JMinerCommandLine : 34% done (28TB 496GB), avg.'1014 MB/s', eff.'1102 MB/s'
2017-06-09 11:45:36.856 INFO 12080 --- [ readerPool-249] burstcoin.jminer.JMinerCommandLine : 45% done (38TB 9GB), avg.'1050 MB/s', eff.'1175 MB/s'
2017-06-09 11:45:38.795 INFO 12080 --- [ readerPool-263] burstcoin.jminer.JMinerCommandLine : 56% done (47TB 265GB), avg.'1071 MB/s', eff.'1165 MB/s'
2017-06-09 11:45:40.796 INFO 12080 --- [ readerPool-266] burstcoin.jminer.JMinerCommandLine : 67% done (56TB 752GB), avg.'1084 MB/s', eff.'1157 MB/s'
2017-06-09 11:45:42.805 INFO 12080 --- [ readerPool-265] burstcoin.jminer.JMinerCommandLine : 78% done (66TB 125GB), avg.'1092 MB/s', eff.'1139 MB/s'
2017-06-09 11:45:45.416 INFO 12080 --- [ readerPool-258] burstcoin.jminer.JMinerCommandLine : 90% done (75TB 746GB), avg.'1063 MB/s', eff.'899 MB/s'
2017-06-09 11:45:50.926 INFO 12080 --- [ readerPool-266] burstcoin.jminer.JMinerCommandLine : 100% done (84TB 981GB), avg.'905 MB/s', eff.'409 MB/s'
2017-06-09 11:45:51.175 INFO 12080 --- [ roundPool-1] burstcoin.jminer.JMinerCommandLine : FINISH block '369239', best deadline '29014', round time '22s 902mMy new build just came in today, it's a Ryzen 7 1700, 16gigs DDR 4 ram and a Asrock Fatality x370 board and I'm not sure what gpu of my bunch to use. I have a 5x470 ether rig that I kinda want to leave be, I have 2 r9 270's, r7 370, sapphire HD 7950 and the current GTX 960.
If I were to just transfer all drives and gpu to the new build will I see a increase in speeds? Are any of my current cards better than the other or is there still plenty of room to grow with scan speeds.
Sorry for the long winded story lol!
-
RE: pool.ccminer.net:8080 new pool for big miners!!!posted in Pool Announcements
@ccminer I guess I don't have an issue either, anything to keep the pool super responsive. I'm guessing the only thing a shorter DL time is gonna hurt is shares sent from miners and their reward for a pool won block which in a sense would mean the block winner getting just a bit more of the pie of a win. Most block wins are extremely fast times anyways which means the winner gets more than likely 90%+ of the pot, prolly more than that and other DL times are usually only worth a few coins here and there. Obviously there are exceptions like the 10+ minute wins were other miners get more reward for subpar DL times. But those are the blocks where I think smaller miners pick up their rewards. I'm slowly increasing my farm from 57tbs to close to 100tbs so hopefully my times will get better.
Just my 2 cents...
-
RE: pool.ccminer.net:8080 new pool for big miners!!!posted in Pool Announcements
@ccminer How the heck u have ccminer 505.3TB on one computer lol, wow!
-
RE: pool.ccminer.net:8080 new pool for big miners!!!posted in Pool Announcements
@ccminer said in pool.ccminer.net:8080 new pool for big miners!!!:
NUMBER 1 (for now)
First thing I thought was tross is gonna have a shit fit if he sees this lol. Just messing with u man!
-
RE: pool.ccminer.net:8080 new pool for big miners!!!posted in Pool Announcements
@Wolf said in pool.ccminer.net:8080 new pool for big miners!!!:
@Han-Solo After making so much $$$ with burst, I have to finish plotting the rest of my HDDs fast. 1pb coming soon...
Most definitely not PB territory but in my small world a substantial upgrade. 7x8tb should put me around double I'm running with now. The plots begin......
-
RE: GPU mining while mining BURST?posted in Mining & Plotting
@Hitti2 'm thinking of a 1700x build and would use it for plotting also, anyone got nonce numbers using Ryzen series cpus?
-
RE: Plotting slowing downposted in Mining & Plotting
@rds said in Plotting slowing down:
@Garbear ,
I use 8 cores on each of 3 concurrent plots. Only 1G or less of RAM is necessary. I set the priority for these 3 to below average so as not to hog the system when some other program needs CPU time. As long as any one of the 3 is yellow you are effectively getting max nonce/min which for me is about 8300. Those 8300 are spread across the 3 files.
But what do ur write speeds look like? Do they start out maxed then drop to 5-10mb/s like mine do? So ur doing like 3 cores 1 plot, 3 cores 1 plot and the last 2 cores the 3rd plot?
How do u change the priority for the plotter? It's a plot only rig for mine so I dont have to worry about other stuff needing cpu time.

