If what someone is doing with your asset, like trading, running a casino or something else, will punish them if they did it in real life, the chance of getting him/her verified is low. Asset issuers from countries with negativ politics on Cryptocurrency would also suffer.
If the document somehow got stolen or hacked, they will suffer a lot.
@Haitch might say that the documents are stored securely, but that is not when you factor in someone breaking into his house. If they are stored encrypted as files, they will also be at risk. Decrypting gets stronger everyday and quantum computers are just about to be a reality. Many predict quantum computers will break most exciting encryption metodes, if not all.
I don't believe it is gonna happen, but you can't say getting verified is without risks.
Startups like @Zeus's Casino won't happen as often as well. He is unable to register his casino, and is therefore risking a lot if his identity suddenly got revealed. The same goes for all other verified asset issuers. Did they remember to pay taxes? If they come from Denmark, asset issuers got to pay tax on the investment as well.
@RichBC. I'm an asset issuer. I can't risk getting verified and something happens. My asset Margin would be dead, if it weren't for my anonymity.
I don't think creating a sub-category would be great. I don't think eliminating non-verified assets would be great. But in the end, it is entirely up to @haitch. This is my opinion and I might be the only one with the concerns.
Edit: If we are going to discuss escrow as well. You are literally asking the asset issuer to cut the dividends by half. The investor could also do it himself by only investing 50% of what he originally planned.