Who is interested to run his own Pool ?
-
@Jumper I am sure you got Node.js too so it beats me why it work rather easily for me and not for you???
-
From the system where the pool server running, I open the browser and navigate to 127.0.0.1:8081, all perfect.
From another system on my home network, I call the IP of the pool server, 192.168.1.6:8081, all perfectSo it seems that this issue is only related when I call my internet ip or the domain pointing to my internet IP.
I think I will have to debug the complete code to see why this is not working.
-
@Jumper To tell you the truth when I am having so much trouble and others are not I think "Format C:" and start over.
All joking aside maybe you did too many things to get this running and created a conflict on your system. Do you have another computer
you could try just to see if it is different? I cant remember ever little thing I did but I downloaded software install node.js did my conf and off I was loosing money but my pool ran. Back up start from the beginning.
-
Fixed :)
http://pool.dogeserver.net:8081/
After debugging the headers sent and received while in and out of mi network, I have found out that my NAT ing was the issue.
For whatever the reason is, the port 4443 was not forwarded from my router.
So I have changed it and voila, all up and running. Uff, that was not easy :)
Thanks for all your help
Now that it's working, I will adjust the CSS and will create a TOI, in case someone else wants to learn this.
And for sure, will leave the pool running so whoever want to use it, feel free to do so.
-
I have been giving thought to the redirect function inside the pool config. I am not sure how the rewards should be set. Pretty sure. Let's say that the pools address is XY and that I am going to mine to that pool with YY. Normally the address for the pool would be set to reward itself, as in solo mining.
I think the proper set up would be YY rewards to the pool address and mines to the pool. XY is the pool address and it rewards to wherever the pool redirects to.
Why would a single person of small group do this? Simple, if I have one account that mines, there is little reason to alter things. But, if I have two accounts that mine, then I set them to mine to the pool and redirect the pool to a larger more established pool. Total spent for reward assignments.....3, one for each address. Now, later down the road I decide to mine those two accounts to a different pool, instead of changing the reward assignment for all three addresses, I just change the assignment for my pools address and that costs a total of.....1.
Plus, two smaller miners are virtually pooling into the other pool and if the pool effect holds true, results are more coins.
-
edit, I am getting my own coins heheh
-
@Jumper Awesome, I always use the analogy of locksmiths going against the magic door. Some show up with high tech gadgets and power, but sometimes that one lone locksmith, with one key is the one that opens the door.
-
@morantis Wow! This words are deep!
-
@bvgfhrht And wrong on a very basic level, but it gets the point across and I have yet to find a better Crypto analogy. Explaining to people not in the business about how all the TX's are lumped together in a block, the block is locked up and then the server throws away the key is pretty tricky, lol.
-
@morantis hahaha! dude! you do alot of thinking... dont you? lol
-
@bvgfhrht I am condemned to a world with me in it, lol.

