pool.ccminer.net:8080 new pool for big miners!!!
-
@Garbear said, "Are we forked or other pools?"
The basic premise of blockchain technology is that over time the consensus will determine who is right and who is not. You just have to wait it out. That's why most transactions aren't considered valid until 4 blocks or so. The majority of forks are resolved by 4 blocks, however this one may take longer.
-
@Garbear The blocks mined on the chain that becomes the consensus are the valid ones - those mined on the "wrong" chain become ghost blocks.
-
@Garbear Unfortunately none of the blocks on the ccMiner pool were valid.
-
@haitch Booooooo! lol
-
@Garbear said in pool.ccminer.net:8080 new pool for big miners!!!:
@haitch Booooooo! lol
But 355044 was :)
-
@haitch can we release the deferred payouts?
-
@ccminer Yeah, I'll do them shortly
-
@haitch Nice
-
@ccminer Payouts re-enabled and going out.
-
@Wolf Also here is a post I put in the ccminer thread with some interesting comparative stats. ccminer pool has only a very small number of Miners so is very responsive but has the highest Blocks / Finder of all the Pools or solo Miners.
@RichBC said in pool.ccminer.net:8080 new pool for big miners!!!:
@ccminer Thought I would share this. It's a cut from the Pools Data with an added column Blocks / Finder.
What I found interesting was the comparison between the Solo Miners and ccminer which implies that the average plot size for the Solo Miners is less than the average on ccminer?
For reference I have 80TB and have mined 12 Blocks in the last 10 days, so just under but close to the ccminer average, suggesting that the average Solo Miner has less than 80TB? I had always assumed that they would all be at least 100TB with then some very large ones?
Rich
-
This post is deleted!
-
@tross I never reply to you directly when you came here before to spam this thread, but for real, I kindly ask you to stop to advertise your project like this. THIS IS UNFAIR because none of us goes to your pool thread to SPAM EVERY DAY, saying that our pool is better, or more profitable or whathever you said to show that you and your pool are better!
SO PLEASE ONCE AGAIN, STOP IT!
-
@tross Is already boring a bit, usually when you think otherwise than the rest usually is not right.
Maybe if you took a little more of your pool would do better and a small miner says that he has used his pool and that he has donated some asset, but of course when I have to leave my eyes on the screen to find me and when I see That memory consumption is between 3 and 5 times more than any other pool, one looks for other options
-
@ccminer OK here's an idea. If tross posts in this thread ignore it, do not reply, just hit the Flag Post for moderation button and ask for it to be swept into the "Other Thread"
Rich
-
@RichBC I ignored his so far and I like your idea and I'll follow it, but was quite unpleasant reading what he wrote in our thread, just wanted at least one time to let him know that I do not appreciate his behave.
In the past when a newbie come and ask for a good pool for mining with few TB I always point to @tross pool, I'll not do it anymore!
-
@Energy I am reading this forum on a computer running a pool wallet, VM for storj shares , my miner and my pool page and no problems.
But seriously all this java brings down resources and can cause things on your computer to lag, Pool code has been modified so its less a problem.I wont be spamming this thread for oversized ego's no more I promise. I said what I said and see it coming true so there no need to harp on what you cant change. But when the day comes I will post I told you so!
-
@tross for those of us who have not read all the drama, could you explain exactly "what is coming" in 25 words or less. Thanks.
-
@rds Noooooo don't encourage him. please read and respond to the Tross End of the World issue here.
https://forums.burst-team.us/topic/4865/pools-for-everyone/3
Rich
-
My little Miner seems to be on form this Morning 3 Blocks in 3 Hours. :-)
Rich
-
@RichBC lol "little"! I was just watching the pool and see u hit 2 out of 3, bad ass!

