pool.ccminer.net:8080 new pool for big miners!!!
-
just renewed the doiman!!!
-
@haitch said in pool.ccminer.net:8080 new pool for big miners!!!:
@rds That DNS resolved name is not the address of the pool - the pool is at 216.165.179.115
208.91.197.13 is an IP somewhere in the Virgin Islands.
I don't know how/why you ISP is returning a bogus address for the site - but I'd suggest you change you DNS provider to Google: 8.8.8.8 or 8.8.4.4, or OpenDNS: 208.67.222.222 or 208.67.220.220
How, exactly, do I change my DNS provider? Is that Comcast or some setting in my computer?
-
@rds said in pool.ccminer.net:8080 new pool for big miners!!!:
216.165.179.115
It was the domain issue but you can access it through http://216.165.179.115:8080... Try to point your miner manually to that address and should fix your issue i think
EDIT: if you don't know how to do it go to %Appdata%/Roaming/BurstWallet/[miner_folder] open the config file and change the link to what i said above and restart the miner... You should be mining by then, if you just enter and hit a block my wallet is in the signature hahhaha ;D
-
So are you guys mining now? http://pool.ccminer.net:8080/ comes up timed out.
-
@rds Do what i told you above it will work... the DNS for the domain is not updated yet even if @ccminer has already renewed the domain, changing this to the IP will point your miner directly to the VM hosted by @haitch without the need to get the DNS solved ;D
-
@gpedro, do I have to do a reward assignment to this address?
-
@rds no the pool account is the same, just change the miner settings and you are good to go!
-
This post is deleted!
-
@rds @haitch just told me it would not work due to the DDOS protection so i appologize but it would work as a fix if it would not be due to the DDOS protection xD
-
@gpedro said in pool.ccminer.net:8080 new pool for big miners!!!:
@rds @haitch just told me it would not work due to the DDOS protection so i appologize but it would work as a fix if it would not be due to the DDOS protection xD
Set up the miners for the IP address. It works. No DDOS protection??
-
@rds Good then you already know that if you hit a block, my wallet address is in my signature feel free to donate some if you want heheehe
It should have DDOS protection, like @haitch said it may work for some pools, i guess it depends on the rules established for each IP address...
@haitch looks like i afterall outsmarted you hehehe jk
-
So I am away for a couple of Days so thought I would mine on ninja and see how the rewards compare and what happens?
Has there been any Attack on ccminer and if so how is the protection working?
Rich
-
-
@ccminer Thought I would share this. It's a cut from the Pools Data with an added column Blocks / Finder.
What I found interesting was the comparison between the Solo Miners and ccminer which implies that the average plot size for the Solo Miners is less than the average on ccminer?
For reference I have 80TB and have mined 12 Blocks in the last 10 days, so just under but close to the ccminer average, suggesting that the average Solo Miner has less than 80TB? I had always assumed that they would all be at least 100TB with then some very large ones?
Rich
-
This post is deleted!
-
@Han-Solo I am in favour of keeping the number of nonces submitted to a nice low manageable number to keep the pool responsive. We are currently around 20 - 30 and I have proposed that as necessary the Deadline be reduced to keep it under under 50.
However I am far from certain that reducing the Deadline as a means of keeping away very small Miners will work? In practice they should not be on ninja but they are there, so my feeling is they may well choose to come here whatever the Deadline?
In practice what is more likely to keep them away is that this is not an approved Burst Nation Pool :-)
I assume your concern is that they rarely Mine blocks but still get a payout?
I cannot do the maths to show it but I suspect that everyone regardless of their TB or Pool that they are Mining on in the long run get's an appropriate reward, albeit in the short run they might be better off?
What would you class as a small miner and do you have real data to show that small Miners are a "problem"?
Rich
-
This post is deleted!
-
@Han-Solo said in pool.ccminer.net:8080 new pool for big miners!!!:
The problem for a pool like ccminer or .ninja is not big miners join together. The problem is that also hundreds of small miners mine in big pools instead of being and helping the pool designed for them.I would argue just the opposite. Many small miners on a pool like this is an advantage to the bigger miners on the pool. First the internal algorithm for the ninja style pool favors the bigger miners by design. If you don't have small miners then you aren't a big miner. Second the collective power of the small miners will hit block in which big miners will collect their historic shares, where most of the time a small miner will not submit a DL. So I would welcome small miners. If I were a small miner I would stay away from any pool that makes me the lower part of the pool.
-
Why should pools be segregated? In my eyes every pool should be an appropriate choice. I favor all pools drop their deadline restrictions!
Go solo if you dont like it!I am continuing the discussion and wont appropriate it if I cant show my views on this thread.
The day you say a single burst miner is a problem is the day you should mine by yourself!
Large miners dont have the right to tell other miner where they are to mine!Open the pools to all!
-
@tross Man pools are open to everyone without restrictions .. small capacity miners will not benefit from pools like this one, its better for them to go to other pools with higher DL. No one is telling them to stay away as you say, this is the logical option!


