pool.ccminer.net:8080 new pool for big miners!!!
-
This post is deleted!
-
Block 345997 through 346002 it appears the pool was not submitting? So are we saying if more miners join the pool will be more reliable or will more miners make it less reliable? Or are there still bugs in the pool?
I never see this happen in burst.ninja. Is it because they have so many miners?
-
@rds I really do not think that ninja pool NEVER ever stuck!
In fact I recall, when I mined there, that any now and than it was down, even for several hours
-
@ccminer said in pool.ccminer.net:8080 new pool for big miners!!!:
@rds I really do not think that ninja pool NEVER ever stuck!
In fact I recall, when I mined there, that any now and than it was down, even for several hoursI'm sure you are correct, but it never hiccuped when I was either on it or looking at it. In fact, when I want to see if my local wallets are in sync I usually look at ninja to check. Hey, I want to be on your pool and will soon enough, but still watching for solid performance. see you soon. :)
-
@rds You are welcome anytime ;)
-
Disillusion lol I want what they are smoking!!
I find it amazing how long large miner mine at a pool earning nothing. The same people complained about my pool but it paid I think they should of gave it a chance instead of following a pipe dream. Make pool for everyone promote a pool for everyone promote Burst. Diversity makes a pool work not just a couple stars. Good luck!
-
@tross we heard you the last 100 times !!! Try to be constructive for a change.
-
@rnahlawi apparently I know nothing! But in 8 months I had a pool with 0 miners to a pool with 360 miners so I am not totally wrong.
I will stop dogging this pool But if I hear my name mentioned I might give a reply.
-
@tross I apologize if I sounded like attacking you. No one saying you know nothing, and you say valid points .. however you keep comparing a pool designed to accommodate everyone with a pool designed for high DLs in its early stages. Yes, Big miners should be distributed among pools but they are NOT doing so and that's why this pool was made to restore possible balance (at least one of the reasons why it was made).
Your pool is your positive contribution to this community. No one can attack you on it unless they caught you doing something wrong. Same applies here, CCminer made an asset and this pool on top of it as his positive contribution. I'm asking you to please contribute with positive and constructive comments.
-
Hey @RichBC extra could is your google drive miner?? If so you got another block ;)
-
@ccminer Yes quite a surprise... :-) Only 10TB and very slow reading the Plot, close to 10 Minutes so most Blocks it does not get fully scanned.
Rich
-
This post is deleted!
-
@Han-Solo Nice upgrade ;)
-
@Han-Solo I've got one of these for my 10x5tb drives and it makes a huge difference each port having its own controller. I'm just crippled now by the usb hubs being the bottleneck now :/
-
This post is deleted!
-
@Garbear Yes I use 3 of these from StarTech. Transforms the speed having a Channel / Drive compared to shared on a Hub.
Rich
-
@RichBC @Han-Solo here is my 10x5tb block scan. Only thing is that I have a couple crappy hubs with the super fast 4 port usb card plus using onboard usb3 ports
-
This post is deleted!
-
@Han-Solo well that's what is hurting me atm. I have 3 of these with with 2 drives plugged in each, any more than that and speed tops out after 2 drives plugged in. Those 3 hubs plugged into 3 ports on the card, 1 drive plugged into the last card port and the last 3 drives plugged into onboard usb3 ports. Yes I have tried many many combinations of trying to optimize scan speeds only using what I have available and I'm topped out on speed with these drives.
Now if I could find a usb hub that speeds don't suffer when more than a couple drives plugged in I would love it!
I do have 1x3tb, 2x2tb and a couple 1tb internals sata drives not added yet but will do that this weekend bringing me back up to 57tb ish.
-
This post is deleted!





