Burstnation & Network situation & Local Wallets
-
@Daforce Maybe, if they start solo mining i guess (but it is never wrong to run a node) ... the pools and their wallets are kind of the burst network backbone ... if they have problems all parties suffer.
@haitch Thanks for contacting them ... i wrote the above for the case, that they just do not understand what they are currently doing ... however they are discrediting their self currently ... i do not think that blocking ip's can be a solution in a decentralized network ... it may cause additional problems i guess.
-
@luxe could it be possible to implement blocking an account? like the same way one blocks a phone number or someone on Facebook?
-
@vExact sure some kind of ignorelist with accounts that do not show up in gui would be possible, but you can not stop a account from sending you a message ....
-
Since this topic is back up, I have a questions - Could all these new people opening wallets and not knowing how to sync them be causing problems? I just hear sooo many complaints about sync problems that most of the time I just tell people to forget trying to run a local wallet and use the online one. Just curious about how all these un-synced local wallets could effect the network
-
@luxe so basically you can't stop on the blockchain a transaction to a given related account?
-
@k.coins I personally like more the pre-release of the AIO wallet than the last version. I find the sync part faster with it
https://github.com/dawallet/burstwindowswallet/releases/tag/0.3.9-rc2
I actually went back to using it...
-
@vExact thanks, and I agree. But... the question remains
-
@vExact said in Burstnation:
@luxe so basically you can't stop on the blockchain a transaction to a given related account?
There could be a transaction type, to store a ignorelist in blockchain, than a wallet could forbid to create/accept a transaction based on that data.
But spam account can easy be changed ... so ignorelist is always behind.
Just not display them would be better solution i guess.
-
@luxe not to mention this kind of ignore list might be used as a tool to fork a chain given you have big enough following who would block certain addresses. Tho i might be wrong about that one.
-
Well earlier this morning, my miner on .biz was over 300 deferred and waiting for a payment (was actually 384 coins). Well, now that deferred amount is gone and the transaction to my account never happened. Whether this was at the time of a fork or not its hard to tell, but I know for 100% I saw these numbers earlier and they never came through so I know for a FACT things are not working like they should at the bare minimum with the .biz pool or issues that are happening on the blockchain itself!
I tend to make about 100k BURST monthly from my miners, and at this pace, ill be nowhere near that!
-
On top of this, I was about to add another 16 TB to my main miner (this weekend) Now im seriously considering just selling the drives since they are currently brand new / unopened. With the way things are going, ill wind up abandoning the coin if this keeps up.
-
@tomahawkeer That was quick! Don't give up, mate. These are just small hickups compared to where Burst is going. Besides, not all pools are experiencing problems, I have been mining on Tross's pool just fine.
-
if we take your advice and no one runs a local wallet you end up with one or two nodes in the network, not good.
-
Ive been on biz for months without issues. Ever since this burstnation crap started, and in particular the past week or so, my results have taken a huge hit.
-
@tomahawkeer So did I when I invested in your asset, but that's just part of the game, we learn, improve our game plan and move on.
-
@rds I'm not saying no one run local wallets. Obviously most of us can figure out how to run them, although they do take care. I'm just curious as to how these f'ed up un-synced wallets effect the chain quality
-
@k.coins it should affect it in no way since untill its fully synced they just talk with peer and downloads blocks. Now granted if there would be only couple nodes and shitload of user syncing it might have an impact (but even then i doubt it since these days upload is big at those datac centers servers usually reside :) )
And i didnt need to do anything to my wallet since i upgraded it to 1.2.7 ;) not sure whats up with everyone else having such problems. And keep in mind i hammer my local wallet like there is no tomorrow when coding something to be used in these same wallets ;)
-
@LithStud said in Burstnation:
@k.coins it should affect it in no way since untill its fully synced they just talk with peer and downloads blocks. Now granted if there would be only couple nodes and shitload of user syncing it might have an impact (but even then i doubt it since these days upload is big at those datac centers servers usually reside :) )
And i didnt need to do anything to my wallet since i upgraded it to 1.2.7 ;) not sure whats up with everyone else having such problems. And keep in mind i hammer my local wallet like there is no tomorrow when coding something to be used in these same wallets ;)
Is there a list of trusted peer nodes, or blacklisted bad nodes us local wallet attempters should have in a config file? I to am using 1.2.7 on two machines. A win7 and a win 10 laptop.
-
@tomahawkeer said in Burstnation:
Well earlier this morning, my miner on .biz was over 300 deferred and waiting for a payment (was actually 384 coins). Well, now that deferred amount is gone and the transaction to my account never happened. Whether this was at the time of a fork or not its hard to tell, but I know for 100% I saw these numbers earlier and they never came through so I know for a FACT things are not working like they should at the bare minimum with the .biz pool or issues that are happening on the blockchain itself!
I tend to make about 100k BURST monthly from my miners, and at this pace, ill be nowhere near that!
Same my Deffered payments dissapeared on burstcoin.eu wasnt much around 45 or something but kind of annoying it just dissapeared
-
@rds not sure, i havent done anything to it, not even blacklisted someone :) tho i was ittich at one point looking at someone using 1.2.2 as sometimes i get in my cmd window loads of block not accepted so been wondering where those bad blocks coming from.





