Burst.ninja is getting too big
-
Cap the pools! Size limit . spread the wealth save the network
-
@ccminer Great get it up and running, make sure it's as reliable as ninja and I will be there. Then just need to find another 200TB or so of Miners and everything will be good.
Rich
-
Dont do it just for the money! Care about something. Putting all the large miners in in a couple pools isnt going to solve network load balance . Do you want the small miners to get nothing?
-
@RichBC It's up - I'll let ccminer announce details.
-
This post is deleted!
-
@haitch OK can't change the reward assignment until Sunday, but will be there.
Rich
-
The pool code burst.ninja is opensource or is it private ???
If it is opensource where can I get it ??? I could do some tests on my server
-
@Han-Solo did you read what @dawallet said.
having a pool like this accomplishes nothing but gaining more control over the network.
if all the 100tb- 1000tb miners move to a pool they will win between 4-10 blocks in a row causing all the other wallets to fork.
dumping the fees is a bad idea as well. how about give the fees to the miners! why dump burst to an address no one can access?
-
Hey @haitch I'm on mobile I can't PM you.
Please set 1% and 24 hours later I'll announce it once at home
-
@ccminer I was going to do 12 Hour - can make it 24 if you prefer.
-
This is the biggest joke I have yet to see here.
-
@haitch You are going to force the other pools to close. Is that what you want?
-
@tross No, ccMiner had asked for a short deadline on his pool - so was going to give him one. He's requested I make it 24, so it will be 24.
-
This post is deleted!
-
@haitch That will attract more large miners and where the small miners going. I said a long time ago this would happen. It will get to the point where mining isnt worth it any more. Kinda like btc but this aint btc.
Theres got to be a better more fair way.
-
@Han-Solo putting all the large miners together in one or two pools will be just as bad. I have yet to see a group of large miners at my pool so dont know what effect it will have. Large miners I mean over 150tb but I dont think it will mess up the pool for anyone. I have switches and adjustment to make it fair. Nobody is giving Lexicon's work a chance. Rich only knows the older code but not the new code :)
-
@tross I would consider coming to yours or Lex's pool if I first understood and then liked your algorithm for the Historic shares? So if it has changed let me know?
However remember I only have 80TB, I do not consider myself to be a large miner, wherever I go will make absolutely no difference to the network stability.
Rich
-
This post is deleted!
-
@Han-Solo Burst isnt BTC
I just wanted to show there is more pools to choose from. But nobody believes and wont even try it out. So whats the point of talking any more. But this all isnt good for burst.
-
@tross said in Burst.ninja is getting too big:
But nobody believes and wont even try it out
I have tried most Pools and made my decision, and yes it's based on how reliable is the Pool in terms of Uptime, Reliable Confirmations, and the Reward that I can get relative to Mining Solo, for the moment the winner is Ninja. From time to time I will try elsewhere but so far I have always come back to ninja.....
Rich

