Burst.ninja is getting too big
-
Rich that is my whole point. Take 5 large miners to my pool and we get 2 or 3 blocks an hour. But instead I get 1 large miner and he decides its not profitable. I wonder why?
-
@RichBC Currently:
Ninja 1 Day
Team 8 Days
BIZ 42 Days
.EU 72 DaysI'm going to be reducing the last 3 - probably halving them
-
@RichBC ninja is 24 hours with 2% fee.
At least at the beginning I would like to do 24 hours and 1%
-
Cap the pools! Size limit . spread the wealth save the network
-
@ccminer Great get it up and running, make sure it's as reliable as ninja and I will be there. Then just need to find another 200TB or so of Miners and everything will be good.
Rich
-
Dont do it just for the money! Care about something. Putting all the large miners in in a couple pools isnt going to solve network load balance . Do you want the small miners to get nothing?
-
@RichBC It's up - I'll let ccminer announce details.
-
This post is deleted!
-
@haitch OK can't change the reward assignment until Sunday, but will be there.
Rich
-
The pool code burst.ninja is opensource or is it private ???
If it is opensource where can I get it ??? I could do some tests on my server
-
@Han-Solo did you read what @dawallet said.
having a pool like this accomplishes nothing but gaining more control over the network.
if all the 100tb- 1000tb miners move to a pool they will win between 4-10 blocks in a row causing all the other wallets to fork.
dumping the fees is a bad idea as well. how about give the fees to the miners! why dump burst to an address no one can access?
-
Hey @haitch I'm on mobile I can't PM you.
Please set 1% and 24 hours later I'll announce it once at home
-
@ccminer I was going to do 12 Hour - can make it 24 if you prefer.
-
This is the biggest joke I have yet to see here.
-
@haitch You are going to force the other pools to close. Is that what you want?
-
@tross No, ccMiner had asked for a short deadline on his pool - so was going to give him one. He's requested I make it 24, so it will be 24.
-
This post is deleted!
-
@haitch That will attract more large miners and where the small miners going. I said a long time ago this would happen. It will get to the point where mining isnt worth it any more. Kinda like btc but this aint btc.
Theres got to be a better more fair way.
-
@Han-Solo putting all the large miners together in one or two pools will be just as bad. I have yet to see a group of large miners at my pool so dont know what effect it will have. Large miners I mean over 150tb but I dont think it will mess up the pool for anyone. I have switches and adjustment to make it fair. Nobody is giving Lexicon's work a chance. Rich only knows the older code but not the new code :)
-
@tross I would consider coming to yours or Lex's pool if I first understood and then liked your algorithm for the Historic shares? So if it has changed let me know?
However remember I only have 80TB, I do not consider myself to be a large miner, wherever I go will make absolutely no difference to the network stability.
Rich

