www.BURSTNation.com Making it Rain



  • @LithStud yes I'm occasionally checking what nice thing you came up with while nobody was looking!-)
    and I'm aware of the lack of decimals. But thanks for mentioning! I'm only using it for my private little distribution asset (and I hate decimals anyway!-)

    PS. even my Polo account holds some of this asset!-) yes you can do that! But you'll be never able to transfer them out of there again!



  • @daWallet maybe a hash of all previous blocks would allow for a thin client, so after each block is created a hash of all previous is also stored. It would also allow for reverse build of the db. Just a thought...



  • Does anyone know anything about Pascal's deletable blockchain?



  • Guys it's free money, just be happy lol



  • I'm going to try to address many questions in a single thread in the form of a question/answer block, I may not address everything listed above but I'll do my best.

    Q: My asset orders seem hung, is that because of all the block transactions
    A: Yes, an asset buy or sell or transfer counts as a standard transactions, transactions are given priority by two factors. First is the transaction fee (default is 1) the highest transactions fees are spotted by the nodes and processed first 2) Blocks with the same transaction fee are rated by the submit time. So actions with equal fees are rated on a first come first server bases. EVERY block chain request goes through this process some of the items include; Faucet Claims, Dividend Payouts, Asset Buy, Sell or Transfer, sending Burst to or From Polo or another wallet.

    Q: Can this be fixed?
    A: It can but it's probably low priority. As PASCAL coin was mentioned they have solved the problem of the ever expanding block chain DB by pruning it back to only relevant data. Our problem is no different that the current problem with BTC transaction fees. If you want to feel pain try sending someone BTC but check the box that says "Only pay required transaction fee" which I believe is 1000 Sats. The time for your money to leave the wallet is instant, the time for it to reach the other wallet as a confirmed transaction will be somewhere in the neighborhood of 90 to 120 days!

    Q: How do I change the Fee for Transaction type X
    A: It sounds like were going to keep @daWallet busy with some updates to the AIO. This is a problem that we thought could happen, just didn't take the energy to correct and issue that didn't exist some time ago. I'm sure their will be a new version of the wallet with the ability to globally set the transaction fee or on a per transaction basis.

    Q: Does this affect my ability to mine blocks?
    A: No, this issue we are discussing has nothing to do with mining other than the fact miners will receive higher payouts for transactions per block.

    -IceBurst



  • I thought the wallet already asked how much of a fee you want to put......Am I wrong?



  • @socal said in www.BURSTNation.com Making it Rain:

    I thought the wallet already asked how much of a fee you want to put......Am I wrong?

    It does for some basic transactions, not for all offered operations.



  • hmm, I kind a like the sound of people wanting to pay more fees to get their transactions processed faster!-)



  • ok, I'll take the "click-bait" back! This is starting to look more and more like an attack on the network!! setting an "Reward assignment" now takes more then 10 blocks!
    What exactly is the purpose of this? Are you testing something? Pleas enlighten us!
    Or just send 50Burst at a time! Then you'll be done faster!-)



  • @nixxda make that a 1000 and get over with it xD



  • @nixxda Yes at first it was Innovative, surprising, nice to have, and exposed a couple of flaws in the network.

    Now I am confused, what is the point of continuing other than just showing off how much Burst you have? Trouble is it's the equivalent of throwing Cent Coins out of the window which can be painful.

    Rich



  • @RichBC it's called SPAM nothing more than this, and it start to be not funny


  • admin

    From my point of view, the miners view, we want every block to use its 255 transactions ... sending money is not a kind of attack ... sure spamming as promotion is far from reputable, but i do not see a real problem here.
    For none-techs it could be complicated to increase fee, if no input is available ... like in reward assignment, but that is something that can be fixed in future ...

    http://localhost:8125/rewardassignmentshort.html

    <html>
    <body>
    Set reward recipient:<br />
    <form method="post" action="/burst">
    <input type="hidden" name="requestType" value="setRewardRecipient">
    The passphrase of your wallet you're mining with:<br />
    <input type="password" name="secretPhrase"><br />
    Recipient - Burst address of pool:<br />
    <input type="text" name="recipient"><br />
    <input type="hidden" name="deadline" value="1440">
    <input type="hidden" name="feeNQT" value="100000000">
    <input type="submit" value="submit" /><br />
    </form>
    </body>
    </html>
    

    In the above case just modify feeNQT with firebug / F12

    <input type="hidden" name="feeNQT" value="400000000">
    


  • So whos the grumpy one eh? :P Since i am nice most of the time (at least i hope i am :D ) people tend to not take seriously what i write :)

    Considering the tx fee, while its nice for network its not nice if its done artificially. Just my 0.5 BURST

    P.S. Those considering putting 3.1 (decimal increase over what Adam puts in) works just sort of still tx got delayed for like 5 blocks (well i suppose its not an hour like i had some yesterday)



  • @luxe the problem is when normal transactions or assets orders or payments get delayed because someone is spamming the network.

    At least it is what I'm experiencing.

    Plus my miner since the spam took place sometime give me an error.

    2017-02-15 19:02:06.576  WARN 30406 --- [  networkPool-1] .j.c.n.t.NetworkRequestTriggerServerTask : Error: Failed to 'getUnconfirmedTransactions' to trigger server.
    

    That I think is related with this


  • admin

    @ccminer the error just means, that wallet could not deliver the unconfirmed transactions in 'connectionTimeout' time, maybe due to a lot transactions ... so just increase that. Sure if there are thousands of unconfirmed transactions wallets need some more time. (btw. that is not in any way important for mining, just to keep wallet from falling asleep)

    If pool payout or asset payout should not be delayed a few blocks, they have to pay more fee ... thats the idea, same like bitcoin. Did you never pay too less fee on BTC and waited days for your transaction :-)



  • @luxe as i said its ok when there is actual demand and not an artificial thing.



  • @luxe the fees level in the bitcoin network increased naturally because the bitcoin got more popular and more and more people start to used it overtime. Not because a single SPAMMER to "promote" his business force all the others to fit with it from one day to another



  • also who wants to bet that if we go 4 burst fee he increases it to 4 burst as well. since i can see hes decreasing the amount sent :) at the moment its 7 burst and 3 fee so he still has a way to go if he so desires.

    EDIT: Oh and scratch my previous comment about decimal increase in fee (3.1 burst) helping - it doesnt


  • admin

    @LithStud If increasing fee does not give a transaction a higher prio, it would be a problem in general ... but maybe your transaction just not made it though the network?! The rebroadcasting fix for future version 1.2.8 could solve that, maybe?!


Log in to reply
 

Looks like your connection to Burst - Efficient HDD Mining was lost, please wait while we try to reconnect.