We now have a Burst wikipedia article !
-
@kmaxkmax In my opinion neither should be linked. Anyway, the way it is put now is not up to wikipedia's standards :
An official Burstcoin forum has just recently been launched with a mission to ensure that Burst utilises it maximum capacity to grow
We can't say that because it's not neutral and impossible to back with references.
-
This post is deleted!
-
If you find a way to introduce both in a non controversial and non promotional way that pleases everyone then please do :)
-
This post is deleted!
-
I liked the hub version... But on a more serious note, this is a decentralized value exchange platform, why do we even need to mention either website in such an explicit way? IMO mention of either is irrelevant unless linked and referenced to a specific fact.
-
This post is deleted!
-
@kmaxkmax yeah, ok that's good. One question though, why just two? The community is much larger than that.
"The BurstCoin community currently has 2 different forums at its disposal..."
-
This post is deleted!
-
@k.coins Yes, and technically can we call the thread on bitcointalk a forum as well ?
-
@Gadrah_ exactly
-
@Gadrah_ said in We now have a Burst wikipedia article !:
@k.coins Yes, and technically can we call the thread on bitcointalk a forum as well ?
No, bitcointalk itself is a forum, but the thread is just a thread on the forum.
-
can i suggest a simple solution? no mentions about forums in article itself. There is a section at the bottom where you can put just the links to outside sources, etc. So that would be a good place to put in Forums, wallets, whatnot
-
This post is deleted!
-
This post is deleted!
-
@kmaxkmax ok now it just looks like an ad at the end of the sentence like that
-
This post is deleted!
-
Communication features such as encrypted blockchain messaging, Burstcoin Forums, BurstNation and bitcointalk.org platforms offer many means for its user base to interact.
-
I think what we have to ask ourselves here is : "is this information meaningful, useful and worthy of being in an encyclopedia ?"
In my opinion it's not. It just feels like an advertisement. I think writing this article is difficult because of our vested interests !
-
I think these communication features are meaningful, however, we need to look at it from an objective vantage point.
-
@k.coins I agree, but I mean I don't think naming both forums and having their links is meaningful here.

