New(but old external HD) formating/plotting info
-
@rds I think I might have to give this a try rather than doing the bulk drive. I'm using 3TB drives with 3 cores and its taking about 3 days.... that's a lot of 3's....
-
@rds said in New(but old external HD) formating/plotting info:
All my farm drives are NTFS, 64k and quick format is fine. I plot 100GB files on the drive to get each completed plot file mining ASAP, rather than waiting for a huge full drive file to finish. Also, if something goes wrong with a file, you can just delete the offending 100GB file instead of 2TB, 4TB or 8TB full drive files.
ok kool so just do lots of little 100 GB files then , thanks for the info mate appreciated !!
-
Well go me hands on 4 5TB seagate externals $130 Aussie each , all hubbed up and let the plotting begin!!
-
Wish there was a way to plot multiple drives at once without needing to use up another pc.
#DevsGet'erDone :)
-
@DougLife Me too but it is what it is !!
-
@Bitdv I think 100GB is too small. I plot 1TB files and with a decent i7 PC with 32Gb of RAM I can do 5TB in 24 Hours.
Rich
-
@RichBC I have AMD FX-8350 Processor 8 Core, wraith cooled 32 gb ram so will see how it pans out
-
@Bitdv Thing to do is get plotting and see how it goes, as with everything you learn quickly. Starting from scratch I would now uses xplotter, but here I still use wplotgenerator and optimizer as I am used to them.
Rich
-
@Bitdv NTFS, 64KB Block size and one large file instead of lots of smaller ones.
xplotter to do a drive at a time, gpuplotgenerator to do drives in parallel.
-
@haitch said in New(but old external HD) formating/plotting info:
@Bitdv NTFS, 64KB Block size and one large file instead of lots of smaller ones.
xplotter to do a drive at a time, gpuplotgenerator to do drives in parallel.
How about the aspect of files generating errors, the ability to just delete an offending 100GB file compared to re-plotting a 5TB file?
Just me thinking along Bitdv's idea
-
I've got a laptop with i7 6700HQ cpu and 32 GB of ram and plotting 400 GB file at a time with Xploter is fine to me :)
@Bitdv if you use Xploter do not forget to run it as administrator as it goes faster.
-
@delords it'll be much slower to mine 50 100GB files rather than one optimized 5TB file. Yes it's painful if you have a plotting error, but in the long term the pain is worth it for mining performance. Remember, you plot once, but mine forever.
-
Thanks, Noted
-
@haitch said in New(but old external HD) formating/plotting info:
@delords it'll be much slower to mine 50 100GB files rather than one optimized 5TB file. Yes it's painful if you have a plotting error, but in the long term the pain is worth it for mining performance. Remember, you plot once, but mine forever.
Which is why I have settled on the compromise of a 1TB file size. Very little hit on reading and not too much of a pain if the plotting goes wrong. That said I know what I am doing now and 5TB would probably be fine. At least with wplotgenerator as it is very good at restarting if the PC reboots etc. Not sure if xplotter does this?
-
@RichBC Yep, xplotter can be stopped and resumed
-
How can one be sure of the next starting nonce without overlapping when trying to resume xplotter after a fail or system restart?
-
@delords wplotgenerator checks and sorts this automatically. I assume xplotter does the same?
Rich
-
@delords You restart xplotter specifying the starting nonce and number of nonces. It has a counter in an unlisted strea, file that shows where it was up to, and it knows from that where to resume from - it continues plotting the existing file rather than creating a new one
