BURST FORUM AND BURST NATION WHATS DIFFERENCE LOOKS ALMOST SIMILAR THEN WHY TWO~



  • @Energy said in BURST FORUM AND BURST NATION WHATS DIFFERENCE LOOKS ALMOST SIMILAR THEN WHY TWO~:

    @socalguy At least someone understood me jajajaja

    I explain if I was not clear I do not care if there are 1, 2 or 100 forums if they are useful, if in the end they are used to advertise the assets and a copy is made and paste will not make a difference

    I totally understood you as well, it's just your understanding of it that needs clarification.

    If someone does a copy/paste of the exact same content with static pages and not dynamic pages that are different because of user's replies then yes, chances are you will be penalized cause that would be seen as content spam, but in this case the content is unique even though there is an excerpt that is copied. In this situation it benefits both sites as rankings will go higher.



  • Burstnation is brilliant work this forum is like big bro but why we comparing with bitcoin, bitcoin is like its above gravitational force whatever happen ll never fall but we are still rising need improvement I m not suggesting to remove one but to merge both in such a way so that burst community is not divided can use both services ll be more exciting just digging wats happening is this boost for short term kindo show-off or a real big plan


  • admin

    @cwade77 I would be disappointed if asset owners who got their assets popular here, stopped posting here. This is the community they sold to, this is where they should continue to post updates to.



  • The asset section is the one that actually concern me the most there so that's why that I'll continue for now to post about my assets just here



  • @haitch Good idea..asset holders who launched assets here would be good to continue posting here..if they want to add to new forum as well, all good, just my two bursts.. I like both forums but some people may not have to time to be going to two forums like me lol..



  • I will be posting all updates to my Energizer Asset (and EnergizerBabies hint )
    on both forums,


  • admin

    @cwade77 I understand what you're saying, but what I'm saying is that people that sold their asset here have at least a moral obligation to post updates here.



  • @cwade77 More to my point if you have advertised or sold your asset here you need to maintain that asset information here. I was speaking for existing assets.



  • @haitch said in BURST FORUM AND BURST NATION WHATS DIFFERENCE LOOKS ALMOST SIMILAR THEN WHY TWO~:

    @cwade77 I understand what you're saying, but what I'm saying is that people that sold their asset here have at least a moral obligation to post updates here.

    Here is my take, since as we say the asset exchange is decentralized and we cannot control who buys or sells, wouldn't the same be applicable to asset issuers?

    I mean, yes if you don't post here then theoretically you are shooting yourself in the foot because you are losing out on sales/support.

    Having said that, the only moral obligation should be to inform the investors where to find the information, even if it is a personal site that has been put up.

    So moral obligation no, out of respect to investors, I can see that.



  • There are many assets that direct to this forum in the asset itself. This cannot be changed.

    You could inform them on this site to go to another. That would raise concern for me.

    As it has been stated it's not a great idea from an advertising standpoint.



  • personaly i think having multiple places to get info on Burst is a good thing , this @haitch forum has been growing for a wile now and stays vary active. it has links to downloads and various other resources but primarily is centered around being a fourm. the differance is that burst nation has a forum but i think will focus mostly around the Asset explorer at least for me anyways time will tell. i think as burst grows we will end up with multiple forums hosted in many languages in various country's. are we that big now ? possibly but who knows. however i think given that for a vary long time we have only realy had this forum / altTec chat that it would be nice to see a link at the top of both that links to each other. mostly for new comer's that may not know that we have two functioning web site's and it will send good vibes to see that the two sites support each other as valued asset's to the community



  • Very Firstly, the logic of creating 2 Forums for more attention is very Funny... Probably then u should create 1000 forums for 1000x traffic ... Genius ! Burst is not that Big to have 2 Forums...

    To Burst-Nation creators, what is the motive behind Burst-nation ?? Something that you cannot implement in Burst-Team or via Burst-Team ?? Don't tell me posting links to wallet & Burst casino on the top... That is something that even @haitch can do ...

    Finally... Why do u call Burst-Nation Official one ??? When Burst-Team is the Official one..



  • @ all
    We have three forums including Bitcointalk, which came way before these two. As far as I can tell, no one complained when Haitch's forum was introduced. My theory is that many lack the history, and have grown 'used to' Haitch's forum because it was the first place they landed, and then they feel threatened when something new comes along, and try to fight it. I can relate to this, but I don't necessarily endorse the behaviour.

    Until now, the Bitcointalk forum and Haitch's forum have (in my opinion) catered to slightly different audiences, which means that we have been reaching a higher number of people than if we had just the one. Now, with a third forum, the same effect may be seen again, especially since there are different people running the different forums, as each individual supporting the forum infrastructure will have incentive to keep their version running and online, just like how each separate pool owner operates.

    Why the heck is no one complaining that we have a ton of pools? Some even have their own chat, which could 'steal' members if you keep following the same logic as with the forum debate. The Burst Casino also has a chat with loads of members who are constantly chatting away. Why do you reckon Burst is so small that we should only have one forum? It seems like quite a narrow viewpoint if you ask me, especially if you wish to see mainstream use in the future. Burst is discussed on Twitter, Instagram, Facebook, Steemit, Youtube and probably lots of other places I can't think of right now. For supporting the decentralized nature of crypto currencies, craving one forum only is a bizarre desire.

    Having many pools run by different people leads to decentralized pools, thus reducing the chance of encountering a 'single point of failure' problem, and also makes it harder for people to deliberately take down our infrastructure to destroy our coin. When one pool goes down, you switch and mine on another. The same holds true for forums, when one goes down, you can use the other. Fear, uncertainty and doubt is the worst enemy of a crypto currency's value, and this is exactly what happens when our services go offline, but it is also what is happening due to this debate, please keep that in mind if you want to do what is best for Burst and our tech. You would be surprised how devastating a single forum comment can be if read by the wrong persons.

    If you want to stay with one forum or another, I don't see a problem with that. However, and I mean this in general, I do see a problem with multiple community members exerting an overtly negative attitude to any development that is done. Developers have spent both time and money to make advances to our coin and tech, on behalf of the greater good. Of course we are all entitled to express our opinions, but some of you angle it in such a way that it seems like we have to choose sides, when we don't. By all means discuss, but please don't over-exaggerate the current situation, we are free to choose which platform(s) we want to support, and no one has ever said anything else.

    In reality, there is just a small number of community members who have expressed hard viewpoints on certain things and who have held a public debate, which is fine. The majority of Bursters are silent, and wish only to see increased value of their investment and to see a brighter future. Don't judge a book by its cover, and let's help everyone achieve success by working together, and endorsing development within the community.

    0_1486297284018_upload-d5ce37a9-138b-4dc9-a195-8373a1371a9e



  • You know what's funny, I've been on the hub and I enjoy both.

    You don't see threads in burst nation talking about these forums, yes you guys spend all your time and energy here, how can you comment without experiencing them for yourselves

    Never mind everyone else be your own person

    From what I see its another great place to meet friends and keep up with content, an opinion from an unbiased source

    Edit you'll never see a post over there about this place so why?



  • @Propagandalf said in BURST FORUM AND BURST NATION WHATS DIFFERENCE LOOKS ALMOST SIMILAR THEN WHY TWO~:

    @ all
    We have three forums including Bitcointalk, which came way before these two. As far as I can tell, no one complained when Haitch's forum was introduced. My theory is that many lack the history, and have grown 'used to' Haitch's forum because it was the first place they landed, and then they feel threatened when something new comes along, and try to fight it. I can relate to this, but I don't necessarily endorse the behaviour.

    Until now, the Bitcointalk forum and Haitch's forum have (in my opinion) catered to slightly different audiences, which means that we have been reaching a higher number of people than if we had just the one. Now, with a third forum, the same effect may be seen again, especially since there are different people running the different forums, as each individual supporting the forum infrastructure will have incentive to keep their version running and online, just like how each separate pool owner operates.

    Why the heck is no one complaining that we have a ton of pools? Some even have their own chat, which could 'steal' members if you keep following the same logic as with the forum debate. The Burst Casino also has a chat with loads of members who are constantly chatting away. Why do you reckon Burst is so small that we should only have one forum? It seems like quite a narrow viewpoint if you ask me, especially if you wish to see mainstream use in the future. Burst is discussed on Twitter, Instagram, Facebook, Steemit, Youtube and probably lots of other places I can't think of right now. For supporting the decentralized nature of crypto currencies, craving one forum only is a bizarre desire.

    Having many pools run by different people leads to decentralized pools, thus reducing the chance of encountering a 'single point of failure' problem, and also makes it harder for people to deliberately take down our infrastructure to destroy our coin. When one pool goes down, you switch and mine on another. The same holds true for forums, when one goes down, you can use the other. Fear, uncertainty and doubt is the worst enemy of a crypto currency's value, and this is exactly what happens when our services go offline, but it is also what is happening due to this debate, please keep that in mind if you want to do what is best for Burst and our tech. You would be surprised how devastating a single forum comment can be if read by the wrong persons.

    If you want to stay with one forum or another, I don't see a problem with that. However, and I mean this in general, I do see a problem with multiple community members exerting an overtly negative attitude to any development that is done. Developers have spent both time and money to make advances to our coin and tech, on behalf of the greater good. Of course we are all entitled to express our opinions, but some of you angle it in such a way that it seems like we have to choose sides, when we don't. By all means discuss, but please don't over-exaggerate the current situation, we are free to choose which platform(s) we want to support, and no one has ever said anything else.

    In reality, there is just a small number of community members who have expressed hard viewpoints on certain things and who have held a public debate, which is fine. The majority of Bursters are silent, and wish only to see increased value of their investment and to see a brighter future. Don't judge a book by its cover, and let's help everyone achieve success by working together, and endorsing development within the community.

    0_1486297284018_upload-d5ce37a9-138b-4dc9-a195-8373a1371a9e

    Bravo sir, *golf 👏 *



  • Change is scary but I agree with @Propagandalf. Also, the community will decide where the majority of communication will need to be.



  • Sorry to get me again but I honestly believe that this is not correct, one thing is that there are more forums and another is that every forum that has been declared official, which would prevent me from creating another forum to modify the code a little and say I am the official forum?

    This if it leads to create confusion and not the logo so some the other day mounted so much fuss



  • @Energy

    I don't find multiple forums confusing at all.

    If it says 'official' or not makes little difference. Burst Nation states it is a hub for all things Burst. The noun hub has a different meaning than forum, so the way I see it Burst Nation is the only hub so far, and they are thus the official one because there are no other hubs. If new hubs come along, well, then I guess they may not be 'the' official hub anymore. If we are going to argue over an adjective, we may as well argue over nouns too.

    You are free to create your own forum if you like. Each community member decides where they want to go, since we are a community-based crypto currency, even if all platforms are promoted as official. The status 'official' is not necessarily tied to only one entity either, by the way.



  • Well you do not know anything that creates a forum about Burst that says it's official we'll see if this confuses people or not.

    Is it the case that the official currency of a country can be anyone ??

    For me as long as it is not clear what is official or not, it is a mistake, from whom? It would be another topic to discuss



  • @Energy your analogy to a country is misguided. This is a decentralized currency that needs decentralized platforms to grow and exist in new spaces.

    Is there an "Offical" bitcoin forum? - No. Anyone can call it official but it's obviously just a marketing technique


Log in to reply
 

Looks like your connection to Burst - Efficient HDD Mining was lost, please wait while we try to reconnect.