XPlotter for optimized plots (CPU)
-
Wonderful job, thank you @Blago !!!!
@RiskyFire I started to test it: same speed of wplotgenerator on /async , but optimized plot as output, it's amazing
-
Can't wait to try it out.I should get my new 6tb hdd tomorrow so I will give it a go:)
-
@Blago This is nice! It's a pity that for linux these things don't exist :(
-
@Blago This is awesome! I'm plotting with it now, on an SMR drive and it's significantly faster than GPUPlotter or wplotgenerator.
Great work, and thank you !
-
Now im new to manual plotting so how do i calculate the nonces? i want to plot a 6tb drive on F:
This what i all ready have on plots :
d: 1507623489964157959_400000001_2852736_2852736
e: 1507623489964157959_500000001_3793920_3793920
f: xxxxxxxxxxx
-
XPlotter_avx.exe -id 1507623489964157959 -sn 600000000 -t <CPU_threads> -path F:\it will fill up your whole free space like this
-
XPlotter_avx.exe -id 1507623489964157959 -sn 600000000 -n 0 -t 8 -path f:\
-t 8 - change it by your threads (cpu cores)
-n 0 - it's create nonces at whole free space at drive
-
@Rendavu Just use xplotter with start nonce at 600000001to carry on your sequence and then set nonces to zero and it will work out how to fill the drive :-) Like they said above..........
Rich
-
-
This is great and fast, Thanks!
can you change the amount of RAM to be use?
-
I tried the new plotter, found it to be way slower than plotting and optimizing in two steps. I had 2+ hours into a 200GB file and it was showing only 12% of the nonces complete. I used 4 for threads as I have an i5 with 2 cores and 2 threads for 4 total. If I use the old way, it takes about 1.5 hours for a plot and 1.5 hours for an optimize depending on what else is going on in the computer. I'm also mining and transferring files across different drives. For the new plotter, I shut everything down but the Xplotter and was sadly disappointed.
-
@rds I did a quick test on a small 48GB file, 14 threads on an old dual Xeon X5560 @ 2.8GHz and it took 22 Minutes at around 11,000 Nonces / Minute. This time and speed is identical to wplotgenerator on the same system plotting directly in 48GB of Ram.
Rich
-
hehehe.. i thought its faster because no need to optimized the plot, still better though plot and optimized in one go.
-
Really quick 58% , i started 10:24 till now 18:50

Before with wplotgenerator i took me 3 days to plot 6tb (without optimizing), I love this thank you @Blago
-
@Rendavu said in XPlotter for optimized plots (CPU):
Really quick 58% , i started 10:24 till now 18:50

Before with wplotgenerator i took me 3 days to plot 6tb (without optimizing), I love this thank you @Blago
i think you're just at .01% of the whole 6TB, that 58% is the amount for that number of nonces (8176) only (600008176 to 600016352)
-
@Yey_09 LOL
-
@Rendavu first iteration of writing take ~x10 time than others iterations of writing
-
at least my CPU is not burning out, i think it is better then wplotgenerator.
-
@Blago , thanks buddy! I like this new plotter.
It's not burning my CPU's ass.
-
Is there a good calculator out there to show nounces info and settings you should use. Also what setting do you use if you don't want to fill the whole drive with nounces as above. I have 12 TB on my drobo, however that would take me days to plot. How do I plot then pick up on a plot. I used to use just the built in plotter, however this one seems faster?



