XPlotter for optimized plots (CPU)
-
@Blago Great work, can wait to test it. I assume the writing performance would be about the same as wplotgenerator ?
-
I appreciate this, @Blago! :)
-
Wonderful job, thank you @Blago !!!!
@RiskyFire I started to test it: same speed of wplotgenerator on /async , but optimized plot as output, it's amazing
-
Can't wait to try it out.I should get my new 6tb hdd tomorrow so I will give it a go:)
-
@Blago This is nice! It's a pity that for linux these things don't exist :(
-
@Blago This is awesome! I'm plotting with it now, on an SMR drive and it's significantly faster than GPUPlotter or wplotgenerator.
Great work, and thank you !
-
Now im new to manual plotting so how do i calculate the nonces? i want to plot a 6tb drive on F:
This what i all ready have on plots :
d: 1507623489964157959_400000001_2852736_2852736
e: 1507623489964157959_500000001_3793920_3793920
f: xxxxxxxxxxx
-
XPlotter_avx.exe -id 1507623489964157959 -sn 600000000 -t <CPU_threads> -path F:\it will fill up your whole free space like this
-
XPlotter_avx.exe -id 1507623489964157959 -sn 600000000 -n 0 -t 8 -path f:\
-t 8 - change it by your threads (cpu cores)
-n 0 - it's create nonces at whole free space at drive
-
@Rendavu Just use xplotter with start nonce at 600000001to carry on your sequence and then set nonces to zero and it will work out how to fill the drive :-) Like they said above..........
Rich
-
-
This is great and fast, Thanks!
can you change the amount of RAM to be use?
-
I tried the new plotter, found it to be way slower than plotting and optimizing in two steps. I had 2+ hours into a 200GB file and it was showing only 12% of the nonces complete. I used 4 for threads as I have an i5 with 2 cores and 2 threads for 4 total. If I use the old way, it takes about 1.5 hours for a plot and 1.5 hours for an optimize depending on what else is going on in the computer. I'm also mining and transferring files across different drives. For the new plotter, I shut everything down but the Xplotter and was sadly disappointed.
-
@rds I did a quick test on a small 48GB file, 14 threads on an old dual Xeon X5560 @ 2.8GHz and it took 22 Minutes at around 11,000 Nonces / Minute. This time and speed is identical to wplotgenerator on the same system plotting directly in 48GB of Ram.
Rich
-
hehehe.. i thought its faster because no need to optimized the plot, still better though plot and optimized in one go.
-
Really quick 58% , i started 10:24 till now 18:50

Before with wplotgenerator i took me 3 days to plot 6tb (without optimizing), I love this thank you @Blago
-
@Rendavu said in XPlotter for optimized plots (CPU):
Really quick 58% , i started 10:24 till now 18:50

Before with wplotgenerator i took me 3 days to plot 6tb (without optimizing), I love this thank you @Blago
i think you're just at .01% of the whole 6TB, that 58% is the amount for that number of nonces (8176) only (600008176 to 600016352)
-
@Yey_09 LOL
-
@Rendavu first iteration of writing take ~x10 time than others iterations of writing
-
at least my CPU is not burning out, i think it is better then wplotgenerator.



