Lex Pool (A rewritten pool based on uray source)
-
@Merlin44 i am not question your intentions to make improvements, otherwise why bother. but you could have fork from uray's repo but you did not, so lex's code is in your repo. and you did modify the readme to remove credit. you should put credit for his code back. it is that simple.
-
This post is deleted!
-
This post is deleted!
-
@dagentlemang I'm not understand, I'm stupid sorry.
-
@Merlin44 where the credits for the ghost block fix?
Why did you break comparability,?
Why did you only fork Lex part of the code and not the original?
Why would you remove the OPTIONAL Dev fee?
Are you now going to troubleshoot the problems people have with pool?Instead of insulting my intelligence or calling me young just answer my questions
-
This post is deleted!
-
This post is deleted!
-
This post is deleted!
-
This post is deleted!
-
This post is deleted!
-
This post is deleted!
-
This post is deleted!
-
This post is deleted!
-
This post is deleted!
-
This post is deleted!
-
This post is deleted!
-
This post is deleted!
-
This post is deleted!
-
this is actually getting a tad ridiculous now.
all ive had is insults thrown at me by this guy, him evaluating the work i did till 4 am for a few months. you'll never see me judging another coders ability and insulting them. this isn't good. it actually makes me sick that theirs people out there willing to do this and this guy should be ashamed at himself for judging someone without talking to the community or the guy hes bashing
despite what he says, i rewrote the function updateByNewBlock(height)
the changes to this function was so pools went off block winner rather than pool balance. in rewriting i added a quick display for who won the block and if the current pool won it or not.also added the block reward, fee and total blockreward so its returned to the clients
Urays original code never did anything like this
i also rewrote the way fee payments were calculated so rather than get added to shares making it seem like the pool owner was a miner. it gets sent out straight as payment when a block is won.
added a feature so users could delay the amount of blocks it checks back to identify winner.
as far as i can see the only thing Merlin has done to my code is add an extra = sign so the statement doesn't do type conversion and some general cleaning.
i haven't seen a single commit about this payment bug he mentioned.
its just sad that i can get these functions copied by another user. all credits for the work ive done removed. and even kept all my documentation that uray never had. and i had to hand write myself after a similar mishap.
-
This post is deleted!
